In an interview conducted by Howie Carr on WRKO radio in Boston Dinesh D'Souza comments, "...and I think part of what's interesting about Obama is how many black holes there are in this guys history and past, and I find it really scandalous--I mean(that we are)...that these are not investigated, I mean we have a press that is essentially become a lapdog press uh, and the normal checks on government are just not working in the age of Obama." (Audio Excerpt. birtherreport.com. AM680--WRKO, Boston, Massachusetts. Hosted by Howie Carr. 30/Jan./2014. http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/01/indicted-filmmaker-scandalous-that.html.)
The level of hypocrisy that Mr. D'Souza sinks to is preposterous when he derides the Liberal-socialist mainstream media for their obsequious failure to vet the 'Manchurian' Muslim from Mombasa while he himself obviated the single most significant issue regarding Mr. Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah's past when making his documentary film '2012.' D'Souza simply ran with the White House narrative in his documentary '2012' that Obama was born in Hawaii disregarding a mountain of evidence to the contrary made public by Sheriff Joe Arpaio's volunteer Cold Case Posse.
If Mr. D'Souza 'finds it really scandalous' that the black holes in Obama's past are not investigated, then why did he not investigate the black holes when making a supposedly investigative documentary on the man's past?
It is more than interesting that terrorist Bill Ayers would be given the spotlight he has longed for by none other than Dinesh D'Souza in the forum of the upcoming debate between the two.
In his soon to be released documentary Mr. D'Souza will once again assault the Liberal-socialist terrorist Ayers on every issue except those which might threaten to illuminate Obama's criminal usurpation of the presidency by fraud, just as he did in '2012.'
Liberals love to flaunt their Marxist worldview. None of the information in Dinesh D'Souza's '2012' documentary threatened the 'Manchurian' Muslim from Mombasa's conspiracy to contravene the Constitution and criminal usurpation of the presidency by fraud and forgery.
All the information about Obongo's purported 'Baby Daddy,' the lecherous Kenyan and his anti-colonial, Marxist/Liberal-socialist worldview is a source of pride to Mr. Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah and the rest of the militant Liberal Left.
The publicizing of the information on the man he claims is his biological father is welcomed by the 'Empty Chair,' Mr. Back, or Barry, 'King Hussein' Obama, or Soetoro, or Soebarkah, (most certainly not 'Junior' to the Kenyan Obama), so Obama and his minions have no fear of D'Souza airing their philosophical/ideological underpinnings in his documentaries, but he must not bring up the 'Birther' issue.
Ask yourself, 'What could Obama's camp possibly have to gain by promoting D'Souza's documentaries?' --and that is exactly what is taking place by Bill Ayers taking the stage in a debate with Dinesh D'Souza.
Firstly consider these questions:
Why is it that Mr. D'Souza does not investigate the publically available evidence surrounding the manufactured electronic file that Obama's illegitimate White House administration publishes as a purported true copy of an actual document?
Why does D'Souza ignore the incontrovertible evidence that the Selective Service Registration Card proffered by Mr. Obama as purported evidence of his compliance with the required registration is a poorly manufactured forgery?
Why is it that in his first documentary Mr. D'Souza did not highlight the information uncovered by Sheriff Joe Arpaio's volunteer Cold Case Posse that in 1961 any resident of Honolulu County could walk into the Honolulu County Dept. of Health and register what was then called an 'unattended birth' with no evidence whatsoever, when it was from that very registration log book at the Honolulu Dept. of Health that both major newspapers on the Island of Oahu gleaned the information contained in the birth announcements that they published?
Why is it that D'Souza failed to mention in his documentary that the Cold Case Posse had uncovered instances wherein Japanese families had gone into the Honolulu Dept. of Health and registered the births of babies born in Japan in order to secure for those children U.S residency?
Why is it that D'Souza never mentions in his first documentary that Obama publicized himself through his personal literary agent for some 16 years before campaigning for the presidency as having been born in what is now called Kenya?
Why is it D'Souza overlooks the fact that Obama has spent millions to seal his records?
Why is it that D'Souza failed to document that the three institutions of higher learning that Obama attended in the United States, Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School, all refuse to release any of Obama's records? Could it be that Barry was registered as a foreign student? Could it be that Obama received financial aid from Islamic interests? One would think that each of these schools would have prideful little exhibits set up of the sitting US president (not) who graced their humble campuses with his presence. The same for the two hospitals where Obama has maintained he was born! Hah!
Why is it that D'Souza completely ignored the single most significant issue of contention regarding 'Bath House Barry's' when at the same time as Mr. D'Souza was working on the making of his documentary US Army Surgeon Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Lakin, now Dr. Terry Lee Lakin, was being persecuted and prosecuted in a military court martial for simply honoring his officer's oath to defend the Constitution by requesting before being re-deployed to a combat theater of operations authentication that his supposed commander-in-chief did in fact legally occupy said position?
The answer to why Mr. D'Souza will give Obama's mentor, Bill Ayers, the stage--just what the Liberal-socialist terrorist has yearned for and why Ayers will effectively promote D'Souza's soon to be released documentary by participating in the debate is that the real issue..., the only issue that if investigated would actually threaten the 'Manchurian' Muslim from Mombasa..., that of his fraudulently representing himself as constitutionally eligible to be president while knowingly not so, will never be touched in the documentary or the debate.
D'Souza will attack Ayers on the anti-colonial worldview of the predatory drunkard from Kenya who is not even Obama's biological 'Baby Daddy,' and Ayers will have the opportunity of a lifetime to spew his Liberal-socialist, dystopian nonsense. While at the same time the focus of the American people will be on all the other issues raised in the documentary—issues of which in reality Obama and his Liberal-socialist/Marxist/Muslims are PROUD!
Ticket sales to Mr. D'Souza's follow up documentary to '2012' shall be hugely increased on account of the theatrical persecution being staged by Obama's IRS as well as by terrorist Bill Ayers participating in the upcoming debate—MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. Obama's Marxist roots are once again publicized, but 'what difference does it make?' After all, to quote Newsweek, 'We are all Socialists now!'
Do you really think that if Obama's camp did not want D'Souza's next documentary to be widely viewed that the master media manipulators within that camp would have permitted the IRS to attack D'Souza over some $20,000 dollars or so in questionable donations?
Attacking the documentary maker would be the stupidest thing that Obama's masters of media manipulation could possibly do. They would know first off that commencing with the litigation would send ticket sales to D'Souza's soon to be released documentary '2016' through the roof--and then Bill Ayers gets a debate with D'Souza.
Do you really think Ayers would agree to a debate that he knows will do nothing but greatly increase the ticket sales to D'Souza's follow-up documentary unless that is precisely what he wants to see?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive." - Sir Walter Scott
D'Souza's feigned attacks in the form of his documentaries are nothing more than sophisticated theatrically staged mass media manipulation of the public's perception of Obama aimed at taking the public's focus off of the one issue that threatens Obama's cabal's criminal usurpation of the presidency and therefore all that they have accomplished in the course of their conspiracy including foremost the illegal appointment of two US Supreme Court justices.
If Obama's criminal usurpation is addressed then everything that his illegitimate administrations have accomplished must be retroactively abrogated as having taken place while in the commission of a crime--the single most sinister crime against the Constitution and against the American experiment in government of the people in America's history.
All those complicit in the criminal usurpation of the presidency and broader conspiracy to contravene the Constitution should be prosecuted and when found guilty sentenced to death.