By Carl Gallups
As the American people faced a "fiscal cliff" dilemma forcing action on monetary policies which could raise taxes and cut government spending this may be as good a time as any to discuss one of the ways the US government could save vast amounts of money while also cutting suicide rates and increasing the collective American intelligence quotient.
The "theory" of evolution has become the stand-alone hypothesis for how man came into being by the "scientific" community in the western world, but is this real science or is something more sinister afoot?
Richard Dawkins, arguably the world's most renowned apologist for the worldview of Atheism, once said "I would not be an atheist were it not for the theory of evolution because the theory of evolution is what drives modern atheism". It does seem, now more than ever, that by using fraud and bigotry the atheists are seeking to destroy the faith of an entire generation.
The Piltdown Man was a hoax in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilized remains of a previously unknown early human. These fragments consisted of parts of a skull and jawbone, said to have been collected in 1912 from a gravel pit at Piltdown, East Sussex, England. The Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni ("Dawson's dawn-man", after the collector Charles Dawson) was given to the specimen. The significance of the specimen remained the subject of controversy until it was exposed in 1953 as a forgery, consisting of the lower jawbone of an orangutan deliberately combined with the skull of a fully developed modern human. (source: Wikipedia)
The Piltdown hoax is perhaps the most famous paleoanthropological hoax ever to have been perpetrated. It is prominent for two reasons: the attention paid to the issue of human evolution, and the length of time (more than 40 years) that elapsed from its discovery to its full exposure as a forgery.
Nebraska man: A single tooth, discovered in Nebraska in 1922 grew an entire evolutionary link between man and monkey, until another identical tooth was found which was protruding from the jawbone of a wild pig.
Java man: Initially discovered by Dutchman Eugene Dubois in 1891, all that was found of this claimed originator of humans was a skullcap, three teeth and a femur. The femur was found 50 feet away from the original skullcap a full year later. For almost 30 years Dubois downplayed the Wadjak skulls (two undoubtedly human skulls found very close to his "missing link"). (source: Hank Hanegraaff, The Face That Demonstrates The Farce Of Evolution, [Word Publishing, Nashville, 1998], pp.50-52)
Orce man: Found in the southern Spanish town of Orce in 1982, and hailed as the oldest fossilized human remains ever found in Europe. One year later officials admitted the skull fragment was not human but probably came from a 4 month old donkey. Scientists had said the skull belonged to a 17 year old man who lived 900,000 to 1.6 million years ago, and even had very detail drawings done to represent what he would have looked like. (source: "Skull fragment may not be human", Knoxville News-Sentinel, 1983)
Neanderthal: Still synonymous with brutishness, the first Neanderthal remains were found in France in 1908. Considered to be ignorant, ape-like, stooped and knuckle-dragging, much of the evidence now suggests that Neanderthal was just as human as us, and his stooped appearance was because of arthritis and rickets. Neanderthals are now recognized as skilled hunters, believers in an after-life, and even skilled surgeons, as seen in one skeleton whose withered right arm had been amputated above the elbow. (source: "Upgrading Neanderthal Man", Time Magazine, May 17, 1971, Vol. 97, No. 20)BIGOTRY
The science community was all a buzz recently over the supposed discovery of a "new" species of monkey. The word "new" is being tossed around abundantly but is it really "new"?
You have to understand the debate dynamics in order to understand why it's important to the secular God-less science community to set the narrative - that nothing exists unless they discover it.
The Daily Mail is reporting
"A new species of monkey with a distinctive blue rear end has been identified in Africa, researchers have said. The species, known locally as the lesula, was discovered after a young female was seen kept captive at the home of a primary school director in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2007. The young animal resembled an owl faced monkey (Cercopithecus hamlyni) but the color of its rear end was different to that of any known species, the researchers writing in the journal PLoS ONE said."
Did you notice what secular science magazine PLoS ONE said? "The color of its rear end was different to that of any known species". Wait a minute! Take a good look at those pictures again. This animal was WELL known to the locals! They even kept them as pets! This is not a "NEW" species. By the looks of it this species has been around for a long, long time.
It is important to understand that secular scientists have a god complex. Nothing exists unless they discover it. And unless they discover it - it can't possibly exist. Sound familiar? Silly atheists.See Daily Mail article here.
This really does place on full display the level of which the converse fallacy of accident is entrenched in the atheistic religious community masquerading as caring scientific fellows. They never encountered a blue-bottomed monkey before so naturally such an animal could not exist. Yet when it is shown to exist they claim to have discovered a brand new species, as though the people who knew about these creatures for thousands of years and even kept them as pets were of no value at all.
So the result is all the major internet and broadcast news sites boldly declaring "SCIENTISTS DISCOVER NEW SPECIES OF MONKEY" when in fact no such thing is true. The monkeys were discovered by people a long, long time ago. But many media outlets have freely helped the atheists promote the narrative by posting this story with the headline "SCIENTISTS DISCOVER NEW SPECIES OF MONKEY" when in fact they are promoting a bold-faced lie.
And so it is with God. Millions of people around the world have discovered the truth about God and have personal relationships with Him. They interact with Him daily. And yet so many secular atheists with evolution as their creation story make bold claims that no god exists because, alas, they have never experienced Him.
People need to realize that scientists are people and, just as M.I.T. professor and Pulitzer Prize winner Junot Diaz said recently 'there is no correlation between intelligence and wisdom'... indeed.There is a huge prize at stake here. It is the collective narrative, the picture people have in their minds of the scientist community. Do I believe the researchers think the animal didn't exist prior them "discovering" it? Of course not. But I do believe there is reason to suspect that the headlines are couched in such a way as to portray the science community, made up primarily of atheists with respect to research with deep-time evolution as the presupposition, in an elevated state of awareness; almost as gods of the science world.
Consider these headlines.
From ABC News: "Astronomers Discover Habitable Planet Around Nearby Star"
What's the truth? They have no idea if the planet is "Habitable" or not. From the actual article:
“In order for a planet to be inhabitable, it should lie in a zone that is neither too hot nor too cold to allow for liquid surface water and, potentially, life,” said Vogt, who was part of the international team that made the discovery.So you see the actual truth is they only know how close the planet is to its sun. They have no idea if it can sustain life or really much else about the floating rock. But the headline boldly declares the "researchers" have discovered a "habitable" planet. This is common - and it's wrong. It paints the science community in a light they do not deserve. In fact, for at least one of these so-called "habitable zone" planets (Gliese 581g) there seems to be some debate as to whether or not the planet actually exists at all. Despite finding that the probability for the non-existence of Gliese 581g was small, statistically, the measurements on which it was based were still not significantly different to the background noise in those same measurements. This is enough to cast reasonable doubt on the existence of Gliese 581g, at least for now. The major reason for this uncertainty is that our current technology is at this point stretched to its limit looking for exoplanets the purported size of Gliese 581g. Therefore the Swiss team came to the correct conclusion based on their data. The existence of Gliese 581g will most likely only be confirmed (or not) with more sensitive detection equipment.
Consider this headline from the Guardian: "'Habitable' planet discovered circling Tau Ceti star"
Again - the claim here is that the planet is "habitable". That's the clear message in the headline. As most writers know, the headline makes or breaks the article. This is completely disingenuous. These so-called "scientists" have exactly zero idea if this floating rock is "habitable" or not. Yet the headline is clear, it is "habitable". This is the narrative being planted in the minds of the masses. But why? The answer in three words is "money and control".
There are essentially two sources of funding for science. One is private funding. This is where the innovators are. This is where the vast majority of useful science comes from like more durable rubber or better crash survival technology for vehicles; none of which presupposes that people are animals. There is simply no need for it. In fact, there are no useful scientific endeavors going on anywhere on the planet which require the belief that people are animals which evolved from fish to men over millions of years.
Science driven by private enterprise will be responsible for the next leap in space exploration. This is because the other group of "scientists" has become a drain on society expecting money for nothing and large government grants to perpetuate the bigotry we see in the news headlines every day. These people (yup - they're just people) make bold outlandish claims of discovering "new" species which have existed for thousands of years in the hope of landing a research grant and, essentially, get a welfare check from the tax payers.
In order to keep the checks coming in there must be a sense of entitlement, as though there is a greater purpose being served which the "common" man is unable to grasp. They come up with unfathomable lengths of time for their unobserved theories in order to hypnotize the "little" people. They even came up with their own language and research categories like "evolutionary biology". I know - sounds heavy right?
I call these folks "welfare scientists". They haven't contributed much to society since embracing the myth of deep-time evolution. It was different back when people like Buzz Aldrin performed communion on the moon and the primary motivation of science wasn't abusing children with tales of primordial slime and God-less education. But now the primary focus when it comes to "welfare science" is what headline will produce the biggest bang to get the biggest grant check. This is a gross manifestation of bigotry and if the governments around the world want to focus their austerity measures where it will really count then begin by privatizing the science and shutting down the useless headline hogs draining money into bottomless black holes of nothingness.
I am certainly not suggesting that all science be defunded. I am suggesting, however, that it be re-evaluated. Real, beneficial science is essential. But it's time to hit the "refresh" button on the funding aspect and ask ourselves the crucial question: what have we done to our culture, our society, our children by teaching them the very unscientific theory that they are animals? After several generations of this can we finally admit that by allowing God to be taken out of the scientific equation we are guilty of child abuse?
Like any parent who's personal ambitions lead to neglect of one's own child and subsequent intervention by authorities it is time for "evolutiongate". If not for our sake then for God's sake - do it for the children. Because teaching children they are animals is child abuse.