If marriage is a religion thing then why do you not get mad at atheist for a man and a women get married?
Michael D. Shoesmith
We have to resist accepting false dichotomy language like that. Marriage has a static definition. It's not a 'religion thing.' It's a human thing. And it is not defined in any other way than between a man and woman whether defined by nature or by God. Bring your opponent back to a place of dogma... marriage is what it is and it will never be anything else. If not for the aggressive use of medical science nature would kill off all homosexuals anyway. Even the natural world is against it. When they make the claim that homosexuality exists in the animal world (monkeys, etc) remind them that nature is still against it - no matter how many crap-flinging chimps do it. If monkeys only had same-sex relations they would die out and in all likelihood suffer tremendous maladies from intermingling the reproductive system with the elementary system... just as people do.
If you believe in freedom then why don't you support our freedom of gays getting married?
At the end of the day the accusation is actually that of bigotry - that our position is better then theirs so in a free society we should all be able to do as we please. Yet, upon further examination we understand that a tremendous price is paid by all when marriage is allowed to be defined subjectively. The act of homosexuality is damaging on many levels. It is the result of faulty nurturing in the upbringing stages of development. So it's not at all bigoted if society as a whole has to pay for it. And at the end of the day that winds up being the case. In Canada the per-person cost is around $1 Million over the course of an 80 year life span. That is an atrocious inequity and bias toward those who choose to not make healthy lifestyle choices but rather embrace an unrestricted path no matter the consequences. The attitude is that of entitlement - "society will pay for my proclivities." The CDC is the source - if men would stop having sex with men then HIV would quite literally disappear.
At the end of the day the accusation is actually that of bigotry - that our position is better then theirs so in a free society we should all be able to do as we please. Yet, upon further examination we understand that a tremendous price is paid by all when marriage is allowed to be defined subjectively. The act of homosexuality is damaging on many levels. It is the result of faulty nurturing in the upbringing stages of development. So it's not at all bigoted if society as a whole has to pay for it. And at the end of the day that winds up being the case. In Canada the per-person cost is around $1 Million over the course of an 80 year life span. That is an atrocious inequity and bias toward those who choose to not make healthy lifestyle choices but rather embrace an unrestricted path no matter the consequences. The attitude is that of entitlement - "society will pay for my proclivities." The CDC is the source - if men would stop having sex with men then HIV would quite literally disappear.
They are born gay.
Wrong. There is no science to back that up... no 'gay gene.' Homosexuality is the result of nurture, not nature. The most recent science has ruled out the 'I'm born gay' argument. This is why, with proper counseling which includes deconstructing the language, homosexuals can live a normal, natural life with the opposite sex.
Not everybody is a Christian.
True - so what? The definition of marriage doesn't change for the non-Christian. Non-Christians still get AIDS. Non-Christian lesbians still have a 50% higher risk of cancer than heterosexual women. The Centers for Disease Control stats are not Christ-centered. It's another red-herring defense. Irrelevant conclusion fallacy. The argument that gays should be allowed to marry because not everyone is a Christian is nothing but a distraction.
Conclusion
In the end the fact remains that Obamacare is being shoved down everyone's throats at the same time as the gay marriage victories because this is going to cost society big-time! And we all have to do our part and pay our share so that perverts can live as long as possible with their diseases to keep voting the liberals in. They are like the power source in the movie "The Matrix"... feeble excuses for living organisms keeping the impersonal machine powered up. It's a harsh reality. End of story.
Michael D. Shoesmith
Social Networking Director
Ministry Coordinator
PPSIMMONS/CGM
No comments:
Post a Comment