Zev Porat

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Rep. Hunter: "Following" Obama's BC "as it progresses!"

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Rep. Duncan Hunter: Concerns About Obama's Birth Certificate: Following As It Progresses

Rep. Duncan Hunter: Concerns About Obama's 
Birth Certificate: Following As It Progresses


Patriot William Lolli contacted Rep. Hunter about Obama's felony identity document fraud and here's his response:

Dear William: 
Thank you for contacting me to share your thoughts regarding President Obama's eligibility to be President of the United States. I appreciate the opportunity to respond. 
I understand there are still concerns about the authenticity of the President's birth certificate—and therefore his constitutional ability to serve as President as a natural born citizen. I believe that all groups and individuals should continue to have the opportunity to present any facts on this matter. This is an issue that I am following as it progresses, while keeping your thoughts in mind. 
Thanks again for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to let me know of any concerns in the future. 
Duncan Hunter
Member of Congress 
[ letterhead response posted below ]

Here's Mr. Lolli's response back to Rep. Hunter:

Congressman Hunter, 
Thank you for your reply to my concerns that the president continues to engage in felony activity by the continued propagation and use of forged documents. 
Your response below, however, is typical of Washington sophistry, as it skirts the issues as well as your oath of office. 
Let me put it this way: 
If you were notified that someone used forgery to gain access to your bank account and stole all your money, you would notify the authorities, would you not? 
So imagine your response when the authorities respond to your concerns with the placation that they believe that "groups and individuals should continue to have the opportunity to present any facts on this matter" and that they would follow the theft of your money "as it progresses". 
Needless to say, I believe that you would conclude that the authorities were lacking moral clarity, skirting their sworn duty to uphold the law, and cared not one whit about on-going criminal activity. 
In such a case, would you not agree that such authorities are not fit for public office? I would. And just in case I am not making myself clear-- I am speaking of you. 
If you continue in this amoral stance to refuse to examine and take action on the evidence that is now available from law enforcement, I will have no choice but to oppose you in the next election-- and do all in my power to see to it that you are removed from office. As we have learned from the case of Bob Filner, even Democrats will support law enforcement when the crime is blatantly significant. Why can't you? 
William Lolli, MCSE

Contact Rep. Hunter @ (202) 225-5672 Twitter: www.twitter.com/Rep_Hunter - FB: www.facebook.com/DuncanHunter

No comments:

Post a Comment