By pastor Carl Gallups
ABSOLUTE PROOF ... (I have yet to have the below information legally disputed or corrected)
The SCOTUS 2015 "Gay Marriage" ruling was ILLEGAL ...
In their own words!
In their own words!
You have to see this - and share this ...
============================================
As you are reading the information below, ask yourself this question "How can a preacher from northwest Florida know this stuff, but my congressman does not?"
As you are reading the information below, ask yourself this question "How can a preacher from northwest Florida know this stuff, but my congressman does not?"
Once that sinks in, you'll see what's really happening to our nation. This is not being done in a dark corner - and it's not an accident that it's being done now.
============================================
In U.S. v. Windsor (The 2013 SCOTUS decision that overturned the Defense of Marriage Act), the five majority justices explicitly and correctly ruled that the Federal Government and Supreme Court had no Jurisdiction over marriage laws - whatsoever. They ruled that those decision rested only with the individual states. Two years later they violated their own ruling - irrefutably proving that their 2015 ruling was illegal.
Below are a few excerpts from that opinion. They are "positions" that the SCOTUS took in order to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act. Get ready to be shocked.
HERE is the Windsor 2013 ruling:
(https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-307_6j37.pdf)
(https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-307_6j37.pdf)
www.supremecourt.gov
2 STATES UNITED v. WINDSOR Syllabus . ty in court while continuing to deny refunds and assess deficiencies introduces a complication. Given the Government's ...
|
===========================================
Excerpts from WINDSOR:
Excerpts from WINDSOR:
"Regulation of domestic relations is an area that has long been regarded as a virtually exclusive province of the States."
"Each state as a sovereign has a rightful and legitimate concern in the marital status of persons domiciled within its borders."
"The definition of marriage is the foundation of the State's broader authority to regulate the subject of domestic relations with respect to the protection of offspring, property interests, and the enforcement of marital responsibilities."
"The states, at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, possessed full power over the subject of marriage and divorce . . . [and] the Constitution delegated no authority to the Government of the United States on the subject of marriage and divorce."
"The whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, parent and child, belongs to the laws of the States and not to the laws of the United States." "Consistent with this allocation of authority, the Federal Government, through our history, has deferred to state law policy decisions with respect to domestic relations."
"The significance of state responsibilities for the definition and regulation of marriage dates to the Nation's beginning; for when the Constitution was adopted the common understanding was that the domestic relations of husband and wife and parent and child were matters reserved to the States."
"Marriage laws vary in some respects from State to State."
"Federal intrusion on state power is a violation of the Constitution because it disrupts the federal balance."
===========================
Those are the words of the very same five Supreme Court justices in 2013, that ignored their own words in 2015 when they ruled that same-sex marriage was indeed a fundamental Constitutional right of all Americans, and that the federal courts could force all states to recognize that as a right. That ruling, by their own words, was illegal/unconstitutional....and of course - unbiblical.
So, what's next in our slide down the slippery slope into the cultural cesspool as we fundamentally transform the United States of America?
Can I simultaneously have more than one wife? Can I now marry my sister? Can I marry my brother? Can I marry my mom or dad? Can I marry my son? How about my dog, or my computer? These may seem like absurd questions.
But it was not long ago that another absurd question was asked, "Can a man marry a man - or a woman marry a woman?" That question was answered "YES" by the 2015 SCOTUS, in a ruling that the 2013 SCOTUS said would be blatantly illegal if it was ever made. Only two years later - it was done. Hardly a single pulpit in America protested the decision. Did your pastor address it from the pulpit? Is he addressing now? Or, has he "moved on?"
By the way - can someone please produce the Federal Law demanding and institutionalizing the fact that all 50 states MUST perform gay marriages? You can't do it. There is no such law.
Don't cite the 2015 SCOTUS ruling as that authority, because the 2013 SCOTUS ruling clearly says that what they did in 2015 was patently illegal, and thus, unconstitutional.
Yet - there has not even been a whimper from our "establishment, traitorous , and compromised" Congress. The Constitution says that Congress alone has the power to reign in a Supreme Court that has gone awry. Yet, YOUR congressman did nothing. Not one thing. Please keep that in mind on election day... or, not.
DO YOU CARE? PLEASE SHARE ...
You never know into whose hands this might fall. Especially now ...
No comments:
Post a Comment