STATE OF THE UNION: More cannibalism in America

Morgan Student Admits To Eating Joppatowne Man’s Body Parts; Charged With First-Degree Murder.


JOPPATOWNE, Md. (WJZ)— A chilling story unfolds in Harford County where family members find the chopped up body parts of a missing man. And now, the suspect admits to committing acts of cannibalism on that body.

read more: http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/05/31/man-denied-bail-after-dismembered-body-parts-found-in-home/

STATE OF THE UNION: Cannibalism comes to Miami

MIAMI (CBSMiami) – Miami police shot and killed a man on the MacArthur Causeway Saturday afternoon, and police sources told CBS4 they had no choice: the naked man they shot was trying to chew the face off another naked man, and refused to obey police orders to stop his grizzly meal.

The bizarre shooting happened shortly after 2 p.m., when police responded to a 911 call about two naked men fighting on a bike path along the Causeway, which was packed with traffic on a busy holiday weekend.

read more: http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/05/26/miami-police-confrontation-men-leaves-1-dead-1-hurt/

EPIC DEBATE - PPSIMMONS Takes on FOUR Atheists

Apart from a few minor flaws the only real mistake made by Mike Shoesmith in his recent debate was that he used too many big words for the panel of atheists to digest.

The video embedded at the bottom of this article is the two-hour long debate recorded by Mr. Shoesmith wherein he forced himself to endure the same old cliche'd one-liners offered by atheists ever since Darwin uttered them upon the death of his young daughter; the ultimate cause of his delusion finally taking hold. With familiar phrases like "look - a bacterium has speciated therefore evolution MUST be true!" Never mind the fact that speciation is predicted by the Bible. How else could a single pair of dogs (wolves probably) turn into the many breeds we see today? When Noah brought them onto the ark he was likely fully aware of the ability of animals to speciate. However the atheist fails to admit that the observations made confirm that speciation is confined to the "kind" or genus. And it was the "kind" that God created. It was the "kind" that was brought on board the ark. And it is these same "kinds" we see running, swimming, hopping, and whatever else they do on the earth to this very day. Bacteria remain bacteria and people remain people. That's real, observable science.

Another issue brought up by Mr. Shoesmith was that of Christianity being an "Existential Paradox". Without a doubt this concept completely confounded the out-of-their-league a-supernaturalists who had comfortably inserted "christians" into a nice tidy little definition. In fact Christianity can be just as much a religion as anything else be it golf or dentistry. So many people are easily talked out of their faith in college or university because it was, for them, nothing more than fire insurance - something their parents or pastor told them was true. When a more sophisticated, nuanced idea emerges from the lips of a professor who knows the multi-syllable words mom and dad could never wrap their feeble minds around, well, the sarcasm-laced religion of atheism takes root and they simply exchange one religion for another.

There are many who live their days in the closed-minded arena of atheistic belief yet never force it on anyone else. And then there are those who live their lives with a religious conviction to eradicate the belief in transcendental realities altogether. The group who took on Mr. Shoesmith were this type of atheist. They invited him to discuss cannibalism as a ruse to debate their religious tenets - cannibalism, naturalism, liberalism, etc. They, as many others, are no different than the Jehovah's Witness or Mormon who walk the streets knocking on doors trying to convince anyone who dares open their door enough for a foot to get in that their religion is the right one. Atheism is a closed-minded delusion excluding all other possibilities than the natural. You will hear, should you listen to the debate embedded at the end of this video, the atheists say several times that nothing exists outside of nature - a clear violation of the converse fallacy of accident. This is the same fallacious argument which would boldly declare that because one has never seen a black swan no black swans could ever possibly exist. This in spite of the mountains of anecdotal evidence which supports the existence of supernatural realities.

The debate quickly shifted to evolution. Mr Shoesmith was quick to point out that he is not a scientist yet the panel offered their typical and predictable evidences anyway. They are, as they always are, bacteria. Yes - the hero of modern evolution. Nylonse, E-coli, my oh my. The problem with this rather limited evidence is the fact that the Bible happily predicted the speciation we observe in biology. They offered another little piece of recent evidence and asked us to look into it while they ignored Mike's recent evidence in favor of Young Earth Creationism; a tactic of plugging one's ears and pretending they don't hear.

The evidence they proposed involves yeast. We found the research out of McGill University here. But we defer to the interpretation from our peers concerning the science of this discovery.

From Brian Morris M.S. of the Institute for Creation Research we see creation scientists way ahead of the pack on these issues - unafraid to look at all of the evidence with clear heads and open minds. Yet the atheists are comfortable ignoring the evidence which extensively refutes the evolution claims at every turn.

There are many scientific explanations for yeast cell replication which do not invoke deep-time mythology. See creation ministries international for a great deal of education on yeast right here. There is no need to credit the creation myth for modern atheism for speciation among bacteria. Once again another atheist hero goes down in flames. See also our many evolution videos at our youtube channel - youtube.com/ppsimmons - for more fuel for the fire engulfing the dying atheist worldview.

Logically speaking, and Mr. Shoesmith's favorite topic, atheism is indefensible based solely on logic itself. Modern naturalistic atheism is a logical wasteland. It is the very embodiment of the perfect example of the converse fallacy of accident. They have never knowingly experienced the supernatural so therefore they argue that it must not exist. This was the most disturbing aspect of the entire debate - that so much time was spent educating the atheists on their own beliefs. Finally it was agreed upon that modern atheism is the denial of acceptance that transcendental realities exist. Christopher Hitchens once said that the reason he debates theists is because the argument which underlies all arguments involves the belief in the existence of supernatural realities and the repudiation of that belief. And we at PPSIMMONS agree - that may have been the smartest thing that man ever said.

To clarify - Mike was asked by an atheist on the panel if a person develops the ability to climb Everest without supplemental oxygen would that person's children have that ability? He answered "why not?". He was laughed at and told he doesn't understand evolution - obvious straw man. Yet if the climber's child received the same training as the climber - then why WOULDN'T he be able to? Was the panel suggesting the climber's child would be too stupid to do it? You see, they were attempting to drag Mike into agreeing with them that evolution is true. They asked him to define evolution and when he didn't give the atheist version of deep time mythology they launched childish ridicule at him per the doctrine of elitism outlined in Mike's book offered as a PPSIMMONS resource.

Get Mike's book today for a real education on what atheism really is, what Christianity really is, and find out now why The Atheists are Wrong and why atheism ruins everything.

Atheism's DISTURBING Doctrines and tenets... plus videos!

One of the characteristics of atheism that is immediately noticeable is the overwhelming amount of foul language that is used. Even the most educated among them seem to suffer from the affliction of tourette syndrome. As much as I hate to do it I was forced on a couple of occasions to delete comments due to their graphic content. I have to repeatedly remind these self proclaimed animals that foul language and belittling others in order to prop yourself up are leading indicators of a lesser intelligence. (continues below video)



Now we get into the meat of the issue as far as mental dysfunction is concerned. Atheists repeatedly deny that atheism is a religion. That is a classic delusion. It reminds me of Saddam Hussein's press secretary, affectionately known as "Baghdad Bob" telling reporters in an outdoor press conference that U.S. tanks had not entered the capital while in the background the entire world witnessed United States Army tanks rolling through town right behind him. Well, Baghdad Bob could probably be excused for his deceit considering the circumstances but is there any real excuse for the atheist besides severe mental illness? No. Their attempts to hide behind the cloak of non-religion have failed miserably. One atheist will say "we have no belief in any god so we have no religion" and recently another atheist commented "there is no way that God could possibly exist" which is a classic positive assertion of a negative belief. It confirms the religious nature of atheism because in order to know that there is no way god can exist a person would have to know everything there is to know about everything and have been everywhere in the universe and beyond. That requires a little more faith than I am willing to give it and still not refer to it as a religion. And by the way, Buddhists don't believe in God either and society has no problem calling it a religion. Again classic delusion.

Now, moving right along here there are some disturbing doctrines within the religion of atheism that are cause for concern. It has been brought up repeatedly that since atheism teaches that humans are nothing more than animals, it would be completely acceptable for one human being to eat another if it was a matter of life and death. I believe the theological word for this doctrine is CANNIBALISM! This acceptance of cannibalism as a religious tenet really does confirm the old saying, "If you remove God from academia the best one could ever hope to achieve is to end up with highly educated barbarians". The acceptance of the doctrine of cannibalism into the religion of atheism is the fulfillment of that statement. I want to touch on one last aspect of the religion of atheism in this segment and that is the value of the human experience. At least one atheist with whom I had extensive conversations with, publicly lamented his own personal use of painkillers and antibiotics because he felt he was doing a disservice to the religious doctrine of evolution. By keeping himself alive he felt he was hindering the process of natural selection and he wished he could sacrifice himself to the process rather than artificially maintain his existence. Now if that doesn't call for some sort of inquiry then society is beyond help.

Let me end this segment with a quote from one atheist in particular which was extraordinary even for an atheist:

Even if atheists were "destroying society." what have humans done well in the first place to deserve to dominate the earth. We use up resources faster than any other organism and more than we need. We control populations of other species, and we make them go extinct. We need houses, clothes, things made by OTHER people, just to survive. All other organisms are much more efficient and can survive without any of this s**t. I deserve to die, you deserve to die, all humans deserve to die.- Atheist

NATURALISM

Naturalism is a philosophy. It is embraced by every atheist. Here is how dictionary.com defines naturalism in the context of our discussion.

4. Philosophy.

a. the view of the world that takes account only of natural elements and forces, excluding the supernatural or spiritual. b. the belief that all phenomena are covered by laws of science and that all teleological explanations are therefore without value.

There you go. Naturalism. Not only does naturalism deny the existence of God, but it also declares the non-existence of any other realm except the natural. Therefore, by embracing the philosophy of naturalism, atheists have come up with several pseudo-qualifiers which have enabled them to be embraced by society. The sub-doctrine of evolution by natural selectionis perhaps chief among them. The apologists of Atheism use incredibly harsh tactics to put unbelievers in their place. They use their time in indoctrination mills to nurse from the breast of elitism and embrace the illusion of intellectual superiority while ingesting the talking points they will later use on people like me. Here are some examples from atheists who proudly illustrated the doctrine of naturalism.

The difference is that one can feel and MEASURE the wind. That measurement can be repeated and verified objectively. Can your god be felt by everyone with the gift to feel? Can your god be objectively measured? Can we all agree on said measurement? Your analogy is as solid as the design of the hindenburg. Atheist

If one has seen no evidence of God, then faith doesn't even enter into the issue. Faith is only employed to support that which is *not* perceived. Faith is only employed when you willfully reject what your five senses/brain are telling you. There is a MOUNTAIN of physical evidence to support the theory of evolution. Doesn't mean it's perfectly correct. But tell me- where's the evidence for God's existence? Never mind providing a mountain. Just give us a scrap of objective evidence. Atheist

Throughout history, most Gods have eventually faltered and failed. Even the God of Abraham, conveniently placed "outside the universe" eventually must meet the same fate. He is a manifestation, and at times he has been a worthy one. But humanity will certainly leave him behind, as they have left all others. Is this bad? I don't know and not knowing is OK with me. Atheist

Perhaps future generations will find that the tendency to create/worship deities was an important part of the evolution of our species. Wouldn't that be ironic? Atheist

There you go. As you can see, there is really no attempt to hide this doctrine. It is, as I have previously pointed out, a delusion bubble. It's an existential paradigm separate from reality and is trying desperately to displace reality in spite of the inevitable outcome.

As an observer of the human condition I see how people, when confronted with the notion that there is no other reality than the natural, simply shake their heads in unbelief and walk away disturbed that anyone would believe such nonsense. And yet the ranks are swelling among the atheists. Why. How is happening? Are they succeeding at displacing reality? Hardly. These apparent victories are signs of the soon return of Jesus Christ to the earth. It is part of the "strong delusion" and "great falling away" that must happen before His coming. People will mock Christianity and say things like "where is the promise of his coming"? According to Peter we shouldn't be surprised by any of this. The Devil is playing his flute and people are dancing in his shadow like pigs to the slaughter house.

LIBERALISM

Now I know that many atheists have never heard of these doctrines but that is irrelavent. If you were to ask a room full of Calvinists what the five points of Calvinism are you would receive a room full of blank stares in return for your effort.

The fourth doctrine of Atheism surfaced almost immediately. It is the doctrine of Liberalism. Let's allow dictionary.com to define it for us.

1. the quality or state of being liberal, as in behavior or attitude.
2. a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.

There you go. Liberalism. The key word in that entire definition is the word "unrestricted". Atheists want to live without moral or social boundaries dictated to them by a greater moral authority. In their defeated minds God doesn't exist so his statutes are meaningless. Everything becomes subjected to circumstance. I once listened to well known atheist apologist Dan Barker explain the set of events that would make rape a morally acceptable act. (continues below videos)

The doctrine of liberalism has led to the modern holocaust of abortion, the destruction of the traditional family, the enslavement of the entire western world due to liberal governing practices leading to unfair taxation, and the degradation of the human condition due to the removal of the restrictions that kept us intact. As Margaret Thatcher one said, "The Facts of Life are Conservative". Liberalism removes humanity's preservative and leaves it out on the table to rot. The foul stench of the decay is on full display in the comment sections of my websites which I will not be quoting here. The rotten language spewing forth from these self proclaimed animals is evidence enough to indict them all of destroying whatever dignity the western world once possessed.

There needs to be no other nod to the ones who claim the soon return of Jesus Christ than the wide spread acceptance of the doctrine of liberalism and Atheism has made it a primary element in its constitution.

DEFEATISM

Over the years atheists have gone to great lengths to hide behind the cloak of non-religion. Whenever someone like me comes on the scene, atheists come out by the hundreds to defend the "non-religion" of Atheism. I refer to those people as apologists. There's no doubt they are highly intelligent and skilled debaters. However, resulting from their attempts has been some overwhelming evidence to support a doctrinal structure that appears to form a constitution. I have been able to isolate five "doctrines" as I call them and this third element is extremely disturbing on a psychological level. It is the doctrine of defeatism. Here's how dictionary.com defines it.

the attitude, policy, or conduct of a person who admits, expects, or no longer resists defeat, as because of a conviction that further struggle or effort is futile; pessimistic resignation.

There you go. Defeatism. As someone who has personally experienced the love of God in both an emotional and tangible sense, it is heart wrenching to read many of the defeatist comments posted on my various internet ministries. For example, one gentleman who will go unnamed expressed a public lament for having to take antibiotics and painkillers because he felt he was slowing the process of evolution. Here are some other examples of the doctrine of defeatism as expressed by actual atheists.

There is NO loving, personal deity that has a specific plan for individuals & such claims are nothing more than a desire & tenacity to carry on living & a reluctance to accept you're not special.Atheist 

I could care less what name i give to ur pethatic therapy group! the fact is, it's all about ME, life has no meaning, so stop pretending u can do better, just shut up and get on with ur day Atheist

Life is merely a meaningless accident, and there is no actual meaning or purpose to any living creatures, as Meaning only applies to conscious entities, when there are no concious beings (human) , there also is no such a thing as meaning; Atheist

Isn't that amazing? These cases are not isolated bursts of insanity like, you know, that crazy uncle that embarrasses you all the time. No. This is a doctrine that is woven through the faith structure of atheism. They've given in to the sensually known environment and given up on the other ninety percent of their brain. They are defeated. They are atheists.

ELITISM

Let's begin with how dictionary.com defines elitism.

1.The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.
Well, there you have it. The doctrine of elitism. Now, I don't make this accusation without proof. I have received thousands of comments from the apologists of the religion of atheism who openly and proudly display the doctrine of elitism for all the world to see. Non-atheists who watch the show from the sidelines are amazed at the flaming arrogance and elitist thought structure that emerges immediately in the comments sections of my articles. Here are just a few examples. We will not reveal the identity of any person leaving the comments.

If i found a moment where the degree of stupidity was limited, I would be obliged to respond.I may however, create a video response for the amusement of myself and everyone else. Atheist 

How the hell do you have the nerve to question evolution when we have biological proof on top of over 300yrs of physical data collated from just about every single branch of science? Atheist 

Did you even attend school???? Atheist 

Rational thought requires evidence, your beliefs do not therefore somewhere along the way (if you ever had it to begin with) you lost the power of rational thought & now clearly no longer even know what it is! Atheist 

I'm surprised you can even spell the word 'intelligence'. Atheist
Ken Ham????? hahahaha are you serious???? Who’s next, Kent Hovind???? haha, oh come on! How about you find me a REAL scientist who's actually submitted work for peer view? Atheist 

No disrespect but i wouldn't read any book written by a creationist as it would no doubt be full of lies. Atheist 

I couldn't possibly deny the irrefutable evidence for evolution like your sort shamefully do. Atheist 

There's no such thing as "creation scientists", these men aren't scientists, they're shady, misleading, religious entrepreneurs Atheist 

Instead of pointlessly TRYING to discredit evolution, how about you give us some evidence to warrant your underdeveloped, primitive beliefs? Now that would be a novel idea hey! Atheist 

Writing moronic books & making retarded video's doesn't count as being "busy". Atheist 

Yes i have a son which is more than you will ever have. Just because your colossal ego can't handle the fact that you are made of animal cells (although i've seriously encountered more intelligent plants) doesn't make change a thing. Atheist 

If you reject Evolution by Natural Selection, then don't go to a modern Western hospital Atheist 

You admit to having no scientific credentials, but you then defer to someone else (Hovind) who also has no scientific credentials (his "degrees" were from unaccredited degree mills). Atheist 

In any case, Hovind has no scientific education either he got his "degrees" from an non-accredited degree mill and "taught" at an non-accredited private school. Atheist 

You can't even sperate from dirt and beeing, you must really be a good scientist why don't you shut up and go back to your little world. Atheist

Isn't that amazing? These comments represent ninety percent of the group-think that prevails in the religion of atheism and is indicative of the mainstream belief structure cemented within the religion. They're smarter than everyone else. Only the indoctrination umm. education they received is worthy of any serious consideration. Only their word definitions are legitimate. And only their liberal lifestyle, no matter how destructive, is worth aspiring to. It is the existential paradigm of atheism and the doctrine of elitism provides the mental and social justification for taking God out of the paradigm and fortifying the delusion bubble that keeps reality from setting in. "We are wonderful. We are animals. It's all about us. We are atheists".

CANNIBALISM

I consider the people who come to my website, blogs, and youtube channel to argue in favor of the religion to be apologists. The brightest bulbs in the room if you will. And most of them really are quite intelligent.

By inviting comments and interacting with them they have done a great job of exposing the overwhelmingly agreed upon faith structure of the religion. We start the series with the most alarmingly obvious doctrine Cannibalism.

Now this doctrine was revealed to me in the process of researching my fourth book, "The Great Debate". I touched on it briefly in the book but I wasn't sure if it was random, isolated cases of disgusting social dysfunction or across the board commonality among all atheists. Over the intervening months I have discovered, or rather it was revealed to me by the atheists, that cannibalism has been accepted into mainstream atheism as a matter of fact. Allow me to read just a couple of the comments left by atheists concerning the act of eating people

As for eating my friend. If he was dead then yes I would. He is an animal, just like I am and just like you are. I would expect him to do the same if placed in that situation. Atheist 

And in my own mind I would like to think I would be able to eat a fellow man who was dead or had no chance to survive to keep myself alive Atheist

Isn't that amazing? I wouldn't dare reveal the identities of these people but those were actual quotes from people on my blog and YouTube channel. Here's how dictionary.com defines cannibalism

can⋅ni⋅bal⋅ismnoun 1. the eating of human flesh by another human being. 2. the eating of the flesh of an animal by another animal of its own kind. 3. the ceremonial eating of human flesh or parts of the human body for magical or religious purposes, as to acquire the power or skill of a person recently killed. 4. the act of pecking flesh from a live fowl by a member of the same flock. 5. the removal of parts, equipment, assets, or employees from one product, item, or business in order to use them in another. 6. the acquisition and absorption of smaller companies by a large corporation or conglomerate.

There you go. Cannibalism. I bet you can guess where this doctrine comes from. It comes from the teaching that people are nothing more than animals. This is another doctrine of atheism that we will discuss in this series. The creation story of atheism. The doctrine of evolution.

What would I do if I was faced with the choice of starvation or cannibalism? That choice will never be a part of my life. In my existential paradigm, there is always the God option. I would pray. I would expect one of three or more or a combination of things to happen. Either God would rescue me out of the predicament or He would provide me with food to eat or probably a combination of both. A third option would be a supernatural sustaining of the body until help arrives. Let me make one thing perfectly clear. Death for the Christian is a sweet release. It is entry into the heavenly. The Bible says that to die is "gain". For the Christian to resort to desecrating a corpse is to throw ones faith into reverse. For the atheist, however, it is a testimony to the barbaric nature of the religion and the need to expose it before it destroys society beyond repair.