Why would he do that? This is the question many people asked of the rape accusation leveled against Dominique Strauss-Kahn; recently humiliated and removed head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
The biggest reason for asking the question was a total lack of logic behind raping a hotel maid while being such a public figure in charge of such a public institution and at the same time under consideration for a nomination to be president of France! It simply did not add up.
Kahn, known for his public fancy for women, was widely considered a womanizer by many published reports. He even said in an interview that his political enemies would probably use this as a way of attacking him prior to the French elections.
Today, July 1, it was revealed that the maid who accused him had actually lied about the event in question and Kahn will be released on his own recognizance. The setup has some deep and powerful roots, as you will see.
Kahn was replaced by Christine Lagarde. Lagarde, who is currently under investigation [here] for ethics violations herself, has in her resume' a history of working for Chicago based law firm Baker & Mckenzie. Try to keep up now!
Baker & Mckenzie is the representing firm for a Saudi phosphate company Ma'aden. The Saudi ties [here] to Obama are unmistakable. More interesting is the connection Baker & Mckenzie has to Obama - more specifically that lawyers who are employed by the law firm made donations to the Obama 2008 campaign for the President of the United States of America.
Thomas Linguanti of Baker & Mckenzie donated $3800 [here] to the Obama campaign alone and that is only one with others yet unconfirmed. The link between the Obama campaign and Strauss-Kahn is established through this donation.
Therefore, here are a few questions we should all be asking. Why is a woman who used to work for a law firm, which donated money to Obama's campaign now in charge of the International Monetary Fund? In addition, why, after she is established as the new head of the IMF, is it revealed that the accuser lied about the rape only after the damage was done and Kahn was removed from the post making the lawyer from Chicago-based Baker & Mckenzie the new head? The political connections here are astounding. Chicago is Obama's political and personal stomping ground. Chicago based Baker & Mckenzie donated to his campaign. Now one of their own is head of the IMF. The questions never seem to end with the POTUS. Answers, on the other hand, well...
(Update below video)The above report outlined a curious link between the Obama administration, the new head of the International Monetary Fund Christine Lagarde, her previous employer - law firm Baker & Mckenzie, a phosphate company in Saudi Arabia, and political donations [here] made by lawyers employed by Baker & Mckenzie.
Now we have learned of a mysterious time line which further solidifies a possible Obama involvement in the scandal set up and also a picture has surfaced which points to some possible animosity between Obama and DSK.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn was head of the IMF and considering a run for President of France. He was in a hotel with a woman who was initially described as a devout Muslim whom Kahnn supposedly surprised in his room and raped. She claims Strauss-Kahn subjected her to a vicious sex attack when she came to clean his suite at the Sofitel hotel, telling investigators he was "naked and chased her across the room". He was charged with the crime as described.
Enter Christine Lagarde. Lagarde was a lead attorney for law firm Baker & Mckenzie. This law firm is connected to the Obama administration through political donations outlined in the previous report.
In keeping with the timeline we have learned that Lagarde's nomination to be head of the IMF was not certain until the approval was given by the Obama White House; an administration which benefitted indirectly from Lagarde's former employer Baker & Mckenzie through political donations.
The Washington Post reported [here] June 28 that Lagarde was chosen only after Obama had approved. The US is responsible for 17% of the money under IMF control. Politico reported [here] the same fact June 28 saying "Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced that the Obama administration supported Lagarde, solidifying her lock on the job".
We move forward two days now. Lagarde's position with the IMF has been locked with Obama's approval. Revelations begin to pour out of the court room that DSK's accuser has been lying extensively. The case against him has fallen apart and he is released. While the charges have not been dropped that seems to be all but a formality now. DSK is removed and Obama's girl is in charge. Voila!
We have documented the donation of $3800 from a lawyer working for Lagarde's former Chicago law firm which links Obama to all of this but what else can be found? It was revealed [here] back in 2008 that Obama was accepting donations from persons using prepaid credit cards. These donations cannot be tracked. It is actually remarkable that there was even one to be found.
Now, in addition to all of this a picture has surfaced [here] which depicts a sort of dislike by Barack Hussein Obama toward DSK. You be the judge of that one. Either way, could it be that Dominique Strauss-Kahnn has [perhaps] fallen victim to an Obama fix to get him out and put a Chicago donation friend in as head of the IMF? What are the implications of this? Stay tuned for more.
(Update continues below video)
Chicago is the U.S. financial center, not N.Y. Much larger dollar amounts are daily traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange than are traded in N.Y. The criminal consortium of business people and "criminal " ATTORNEYS of Chicago, Obama-con being are mere figurehead for them since the usurpation of the People's government from all the People's honest hands, actually operate the U.S. government for profit and power. The attorneys of Baker And McKenzie, and other law "corporations", truly are the covetous scum of the earth hiding behind office holders. What goes around, comes back to bite.
ReplyDelete