(Image - Yahoo images)
Christopher Hitchens died December 15, 2011. He was a staunch anti-theist and made a considerable living writing books denouncing the belief in transcendental realities like God. He also worked the debate circuit challenging great thinkers like William Lane Craig and Frank Turek.
The irony here comes in the way Hitchens died - Esophageal cancer - or cancer of the throat. He was literally rendered speechless. Interesting, is it not, that a man dedicated to speaking out against the existence of God would get a disease which disables one's ability to speak? No? Right - it's probably just a giant coincidence.
Christopher was a foul human being. He resisted the classy route of cordial debate and instead mocked and ridiculed his opponents no matter how dedicated the theist was in remaining respectful. More often than not Hitchens wouldn't even look his opponent in the eye - a disrespect Al Sharpton was quick to rebuke Hitchens for in their debate.
I realize some people may be thinking "it's too soon". Wrong. Hitchens deserves no less than a rude homage - a roasting from the living to the dead atheist. "When he eulogized famous religious figures, Christopher Hitchens contemptuously brushed aside conventional sensibilities, unleashing his Oxford-bred, wickedly witty disdain on the departed, often, it seemed, before the body had became cold" wrote WND's Art Moore. Is this article a case of paying evil for evil? Not at all. This is the harvest Hitchen's gets for the seeds of anger, vitriol, and disrespect he sowed into the soil in the arena of ideas. Moore further writes:
Hitchens was a leading figure and one of the "four horsemen" of the New Atheist movement. He resembled that pudgy little kid that everyone thought was "cute" no matter the caustic nonsense that spews out of the hole in their head. The article in WND by Moore expressed a fondness for "Hitch" by many of the people who debated him but it was merely a fondness for a joke - a silly man who knew big words and resembled a child so ugly only a mother could love it - proverbially speaking of course.
Oesophageal cancer is NOT cancer of the throat and leave you speechless. It is cancer of the gullet. Hitchens contracted it because he was a heavy smoker and drinker as well as having a strong family history. No real surprises there and no need to invoke divine intervention. The last patient I saw with this was a Christian believer. What has he done to 'deserve' this horrible disease?
ReplyDelete@t0x0philus... the folks at PPSIMMONS never invoked "divine intervention". Maybe this video will clear things up for you.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fe1-dE067Jw
You have to look no further than the first 30 seconds of any of these people's videos to see why they disable video ratings and comments on YouTube. They hate Hitchens because he, of all people, was able to fearlessly and clearly point out how ridiculous their claims were and still are and is the main reason religion is only but a whimpering shadow of its former self.
ReplyDelete"Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them; and no man ever had a distinct idea of the trinity. It is the mere Abracadabra of the mountebanks calling themselves the priests of Jesus."
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Francis Adrian Van der Kemp, 30 July, 1816
There are several instances in the Bible that reference demons rendering people speechless, causing them to fall ill, physically and mentally. It's probable to me that Hitchen was being haunted by a demon. Demonic possessions are far more common than people would believe. They take on different forms than the hype that is seen in the media!
ReplyDeleteTruth is, Hitchens was just a man, a foolish sinner, perhaps even demonically possessed at some point. But Jesus died, and he died for Hitchens too, not just the believers. Jesus paid the ultimate price for our sins, and now someone he died for is in eternal damnation. Will only see compassion from me and nothing else.
Prove it.
DeleteThere are several instances in the bible that command you to stone your son to death if he disobeys you, yet I don't see the religious taking that seriously, so I don't see why you would take the bit about demons seriously. Hitchens had cancer, his father before him had the same disease, some cancers are genetically passed from father to son. I simply cannot make this any more clear for you. It wasn't demons. It wasn't divine judgement. It wasn't Jerry Falwell coming back to haunt him. It was cancer.
ReplyDeleteSee how easy and un-convoluted the naturalistic explanation is?
@Nik There is something known as a generational curse! Very likely in Hitchens scenario!
ReplyDeleteJesus didn't die for anyone. You claim he has risen from the dead therefore is not dead. You also claim that he is God - and therefore knew he was going to rise again. In what way is that a sacrifice if he knew he would not ultimately be dead?
ReplyDeletePiss Pants Simmons... wow, you're a load of wasted cells. If your two brain cells ever met one another, you might be considered dangerous... I challenge you to prove your bible to be more accurate than the Vedas... your god to be more real than Vishnu or Horus... until then... peace.
ReplyDeleteI second your adjectives! Bigots the lot of them.
DeleteWas Hitchen's death punishment for what he did and was. Don't know, but it's possible.
ReplyDeleteDeuteronomy 28:27
The LORD will strike you with the boils of Egypt, with tumors, with the scab, and with the itch, from which you cannot be healed.
Deuteronomy 28:26-28 (in Context) Deuteronomy 28 (Whole Chapter)
1 Samuel 5:6
But the hand of the LORD was heavy on the people of Ashdod, and He ravaged them and struck them with tumors, both Ashdod and its territory.
1 Samuel 5:5-7 (in Context) 1 Samuel 5 (Whole Chapter)
1 Samuel 5:9
So it was, after they had carried it away, that the hand of the LORD was against the city with a very great destruction; and He struck the men of the city, both small and great, and tumors broke out on them.
1 Samuel 5:8-10 (in Context) 1 Samuel 5 (Whole Chapter)
1 Samuel 5:12
And the men who did not die were stricken with the tumors, and the cry of the city went up to heaven.
1 Samuel 5:11-12 (in Context) 1 Samuel 5 (Whole Chapter)
1 Samuel 6:4
Then they said, “What is the trespass offering which we shall return to Him?” They answered, “Five golden tumors and five golden rats, according to the number of the lords of the Philistines. For the same plague was on all of you and on your lords.
1 Samuel 6:3-5 (in Context) 1 Samuel 6 (Whole Chapter)
1 Samuel 6:5
Therefore you shall make images of your tumors and images of your rats that ravage the land, and you shall give glory to the God of Israel; perhaps He will lighten His hand from you, from your gods, and from your land.
1 Samuel 6:4-6 (in Context) 1 Samuel 6 (Whole Chapter)
1 Samuel 6:11
And they set the ark of the LORD on the cart, and the chest with the gold rats and the images of their tumors.
1 Samuel 6:10-12 (in Context) 1 Samuel 6 (Whole Chapter)
1 Samuel 6:17
These are the golden tumors which the Philistines returned as a trespass offering to the LORD: one for Ashdod, one for Gaza, one for Ashkelon, one for Gath, one for Ekron;
1 Samuel 6:16-18 (in Context) 1 Samuel 6 (Whole Chapter)
"rats and tumors" probably had to do with an outbreak of bubonic plague. "In the light of the modern research which has proved that the rat-flea (Pulex cheopis) is the most active agent in conveying the virus of plague to the human subject, it is worthy of note that the plague of tumors was accompanied by an invasion of mice (`akhbor) or rats (http://www.biblestudytools.com/encyclopedias/isbe/emerods.html). This bible study tool reveals that there was probably a plague that had nothing to do with the wrath of God. Therefore, it had nothing to do with Cancer, which we could have cured by now if people would move on from superstition and religious dogma. Read about the Black Death of the 14th century. IF people would have made the association between mice, rats and the plague in the bible then millions could have been saved. If only people would have read it more as a history, however flawed, than some Devine text.
ReplyDelete