Zev Porat

Friday, June 14, 2013

Joseph Farah counters Rubio's use of Bible to argue for immigration bill

"I think the biggest change hasn't been in the pulpit. It's been in the pews. Our faith has always been about compassion and it compels you to do something. If you took compassion or the principle of compassion out of the Bible, it would be in tatters because it's all over the place."

– Sen. Marco Rubio on why amnesty for illegal aliens is morally right

Is Sen. Marco Rubio correct when he says providing a blanket amnesty for illegal aliens is the "compassionate" response for Americans?

Is he correct when he says it's the biblical response to America's problem with immigration laws being broken?

While Rubio is right about the word "compassionate" being found frequently in the Bible, it is not found in the context of excusing lawbreaking, non-enforcement of duly enacted laws or borderless nations.

Quite the contrary.

The Bible clearly and consistently speaks to the opposite agenda.

READ THE REST HERE and watch VIDEO: http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/why-amnesty-is-not-compassionate/


No comments:

Post a Comment