by Rev. Joda Collins
Source: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/09/09/Maaloula-Syria-rebels?utm_source=e_breitbart_com&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Breitbart+News+Roundup%2C+September+9%2C+2013&utm_campaign=20130909_m117165653_Breitbart+News+Roundup%2C+September+9%2C+2013&utm_term=More
Where is the outrage from Obama for this ongoing and often repeated atrocity from his friends or is it only the deaths of Al-Qaeda terrorists that cause him to want to use US military and US money in retaliation? The killing of few hundred Al-Qaeda terrorists cause Obama enough emotional distress that he is eager to start WW3 while the death of thousands of Christians at the hand of Islamic-terrorists is not worth a single word from him.
Obama will call attention to two things. First, the death of Al-Qaeda Syrian rebels was the result of chemical warfare and chemical warfare is outlawed by the international community. That is a valid point. Still, however, we do not know who used the chemicals. Obama and Kerry said they know and we can trust them when they say that Assad (the Syrian President) did it.
Obama and Kerry are liars, so, the bottom line is we do not know who used the chemicals. Obama has a personal agenda of getting rid of Assad so Al-Qaeda and/or the Muslim Brotherhood can be in "official" political power in Syria. Therefore, anything Obama (or his cronies in crime) say to try to implicate Assad has to be considered in the light of a sociopath with an agenda.
Obama and Kerry are liars, so, the bottom line is we do not know who used the chemicals. Obama has a personal agenda of getting rid of Assad so Al-Qaeda and/or the Muslim Brotherhood can be in "official" political power in Syria. Therefore, anything Obama (or his cronies in crime) say to try to implicate Assad has to be considered in the light of a sociopath with an agenda.
Second, Obama will say that in the use of chemical warfare, "innocent people were killed and that is unacceptable." However, we have seldom dropped a bomb anywhere where both the guilty and the innocent died. It is called "collateral damage" by Obama and is completely acceptable to Obama when he does it. Therefore a thinking mind would completely reject Obama's false concern for the innocent that perish with the guilty.
This brings me to another valid point. The Al-Qaeda Syrian rebels, that were killed with chemical weapons, deserved to die. Of course they are anti-Israel, anti-American, anti-capitalism, anti-Christian and pro-Islam killers of women and children so they are supported by Obama. Their deaths seem to be overwhelmingly traumatic events for our President or it may be that their deaths are welcome, convenient (and/or planned) stepping stones to getting rid of Assad. Either way, God help America.
There is mounting evidence that the Al-Qaeda Syrian rebels have a stockpile of and use chemicals in war.
Source: http://www.infowars.com/video-syrian-rebel-admits-using-chemical-weapons/ and http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/0909/Leaked-Iranian-letter-warned-US-that-Syrian-rebels-have-chemical-weapons.
Why is Obama silent about these realities? Answer: They are Al-Qaeda. Who is Al-Qaeda?
The below photo is a reminder.
Source: http://www.infowars.com/video-syrian-rebel-admits-using-chemical-weapons/ and http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/0909/Leaked-Iranian-letter-warned-US-that-Syrian-rebels-have-chemical-weapons.
Why is Obama silent about these realities? Answer: They are Al-Qaeda. Who is Al-Qaeda?
The below photo is a reminder.
Disclaimer: I (Joda Collins) make no claim that any of my views or opinions are shared by anyone else.
No comments:
Post a Comment