The Post & Email’s Open Letter to Those Masquerading as the Media
Posted By Sharon Rondeau On Monday, December 2, 2013 @ 10:56 PM In Editorials |
“LOOK IN THE MIRROR”
December 2, 2013
Putative
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney was given a letter signed by 39
members of the media protesting lack of access and ability to photograph
Obama in his official capacity.
To the 39 “media” outlets protesting lack of access to the Obama White House in a hand-delivered letter on November 21, 2013:
Your missive to putative White House spokesman Jay Carney will fall on deaf ears.
You wonder why Obama’s handlers will not
allow you access to “the President while he is performing his official
duties.” You question why only sanitized, poised photos released by the
White House are allowed to circulate in the public arena. In order to
obtain answers, however, you need to look at yourselves and admit what
you, not Obama, did to your profession.
Had you researched Obama’s background in
2007 and 2008, you would have found out that he is a communist.
“Communist,” you say? Oh, you believed that communists were a thing of
the past, something railed about by that crazy Sen. Joseph McCarthy
back in the 1950s while more sophisticated members of the Congress and
the “media” laughed behind his back or ridiculed him openly. Yes,
ridicule is a thing you “journalists” do quite well when you see
something that is simply below your elevated stature to investigate.
An example is the questions about Obama’s constitutional eligibility which arose in 2008.
In late 2007, progressive talking head Chris Matthews said on MSNBC that “Obama was born in Indonesia.” While Matthews failed to cite a source for his statement, a second
similar report went to print in a Hawaii publication shortly
thereafter. None of you was even the slightest bit curious about
Obama’s background and whether or not he was constitutionally eligible
to occupy the highest office in the land. You gave no thought to Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution which mandates that only a “natural born Citizen” be elected to the presidency.
You are now beside yourselves because
the Obama regime has imposed “restrictions” which “raise constitutional
concerns.” However, you are five years too late. Those of us who had
“constitutional concerns” when we saw a foreigner campaigning for the
office of President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States of
America were ridiculed, brushed aside, made pariahs, forbidden from
speaking our minds on your precious airwaves, and banished to the
blogosphere for even suggesting that Obama was not constitutionally
eligible or possessed other impediments to serving in that capacity.
Now, you are indignant that this
foreign-born domestic enemy, this friend of radical Islam, this
charlatan who has usurped the Oval Office each and every day for the
last five years, denigrating and spitting on America, has limited what
you perceive as your First Amendment rights.
Look in the mirror.
Because you failed to act, because you
failed to investigate, because you wanted Obama to win the presidency
whether or not he met the eligibility criteria, the United States of
America is now held hostage by a group of 1960s radicals who wish to see
all of you, and us, destroyed. If you would remove your blinders just a
little bit more, you would see, in all of its stark reality, that the
enemy from within is not only within the gates, but now rules supreme.
Do you really believe that the takeover
of the auto industry was necessary, that dealerships were closed
randomly, that so many stockholders lost their investments without
recourse in the courts because it was constitutional? And how
prodigiously did you report on Obama’s bowing to the Saudi king in
2009? Did you host commentators with opposing views to analyze what
Obama intended by that and other of his actions?
Do you really believe that the sequestration cuts
affecting the military are not imposed by design after Obama
skyrocketed the national debt to over $17 trillion in order to reward
his former campaign bundlers and other cronies with Americans’
hard-earned dollars?
What did you do after the Obama regime
removed all references to “radical Islam” from FBI and military training
manuals? Did you rejoice at how inclusive your black president was, or
did you ask why it was done? Did you wonder why Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley‘s career was ruined because Obama’s Joint Chiefs Chairman, Gen. Martin Dempsey, became a shill for his Islamic boss?
Did you ever investigate why Lt. Col. Terry Lakin
sat in a cold, hard cell at Ft. Leavenworth for five months for
questioning Obama’s eligibility and why no one in Congress could answer
the question? Or did you remain in your comfortable offices and lounge
chairs living the good life while Obama continued to eviscerate what was
left of it?
Do you wonder why Islamic terrorism is on the rise, as admitted
by a leading Democrat senator on Sunday? Do you wonder why nearly four
times the number of U.S. soldiers’ lives have been lost in Afghanistan
under the man you propelled into a position of commanding our military
than under his predecessor?
Do you ever wonder about the young men
who have been court-martialed unfairly because Obama’s Rules of
Engagement have tied their hands while Islamic terrorists shoot at their
hearts and their men? Do you even cover those cases? Or are you above
that, too?
Did it ever enter your minds that your
lack of concern for America, and your intense desire to see a
progressive candidate “fundamentally transform America,” have caused
your current frustration over Obama’s lack of “transparency” today?
The truth is, you are the ones who have
done a disservice to America by refusing to investigate Obama’s
background. You never reported that he was a member of the New Party in
Chicago, that he used and may still use aliases, that his background
and life story make no sense, and that he has associated with Chicago’s
underground since before he entered politics. All of that was below
you, and you certainly didn’t want to unearth any undesirable
information on your chosen man.
On a daily basis, you deny Americans the
information they need to make sound decisions about their government
while promoting your own pet agendas.
Now, most egregiously, you have not
looked into the matter of the forgery of Obama’s long-form birth
certificate as reported at two press conferences last year. Instead of
launching bona fide investigations of your own after Mike Zullo and
Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced their findings of fraud and forgery, you
became angry at the messengers because their words did not mesh with
your doctrinaire beliefs that your Anointed One, Barack Hussein Obama,
would ever engage in obfuscation and secrecy to the extent that his real
identity is not even known.
Had you investigated Obama in 2008,
America would not be facing the crisis currently visited upon us now.
Instead of indignantly protesting the “troubling precedent” which the
regime has imposed on you by limiting your access to photograph its
figurehead, why don’t you question why they would do such a thing? Why
don’t you ask why Obama is the most un-American person to have ever
stepped foot in the White House outside of his Muslim Brotherhood
friends, whose visits occur under the cloak of secrecy? Why don’t you
question what he is doing to all of us by depriving people of their
right to choose whether or not to buy health insurance?
Where are your tough questions for the
regime as cancer patients lose their coverage and, after speaking out,
receive audit notices from the IRS?
Why can’t you admit that you were wrong?
Did you ever read George Orwell’s 1984? If not, you need to.
Do you not wonder why the EPA is
destroying jobs, why there is no economic recovery, and the reason that
there are so many Muslims working at the Department of Homeland
Security?
How many questions have you asked about
the deaths of four Americans and the injuries of several others in
Beghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012? Or were you too scared to speak
up for fear that you might lose access to the faux administration?
It didn’t matter what you did; you have lost that access anyway, as evidenced by your letter.
I
nstead of hoping to fulfill your own
political desires for America, you should have upheld your duty to
perform your First Amendment function before Obama cheated his way in to
the people’s house at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue by doing old-fashioned
investigative journalism instead of the whitewash so typical of big
media companies today.
If you are concerned about your
constitutional rights being trampled, why are you not concerned about
Americans’ right to have a constitutionally-eligible individual without
foreign allegiances in our White House? Has it occurred to you that the
man you call “the President” has absolutely no right to even pretend to
hold the office?
You decry Obama’s absconding of your
First Amendment rights, but I decry your wanton destruction of the
entire Constitution and Bill of Rights by failing to vet this man who
continues to wreak his havoc on a nation now reeling from the effects of
his evil intent.
One of you on the list of media
companies protesting Obama’s “limits” on the press has been identified
as a criminal co-conspirator in two affidavits presented to a U.S.
District Court and now the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. One of your
reporters is specifically named as having purposely provided false
information to the public to convince them that Obama was born in Hawaii
when there is no evidence to prove that that is the case. Oh, but yes,
you never investigated that and ridiculed those who did, so you
wouldn’t know…those “Birthers” are crazy, now, aren’t they?
If the allegations against NBC News are
true, what does that say about the whole sorry lot of you for going
along with the “born in Hawaii” charade?
What it says is that your day is past.
You sold out America for 30 pieces of silver, or whatever your price was
to continue to preen yourselves and draw your six-figure salaries from
your corrupt news bureaus. You are part of the problem, and in fact,
you are the problem, as evidenced by your complete disregard for the truth.
Do some reading on Germany in the 1930s,
and you will have your answer as to why your “constitutional concerns”
will not be addressed. This time, Carney and his ilk will be ridiculing
you, wondering which one of you he will take to the woodshed, or worse,
for daring to sign on to such a bold letter.
Those who propelled Hugo Chavez to power
in Venezuela had their property and businesses seized by the very man
they had supported.
Those who catapulted Obama into the White House without proper vetting to protect the constitutional rights of all Americans are now being silenced.
Now look in the mirror.
Therein lies your answer.
Instead of wringing your hands and
worrying if you will be next to receive a nasty phone call from one of
Obama’s handlers, pick up the phone and call Mike Zullo. Call Sheriff
Arpaio. Call Rep. Steve Stockman. Call someone who can show you the
proof that Obama is a fraud.
Then, take a deep breath and do what
needs to be done. Tell the American people the truth if you really care
about constitutional rights. Throw them a lifeline.
You have all the tools you need, but do you have the courage?Sincerely,
Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT 06076
© 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment