Texas neighborhood overrun by protected birds that create mess and stench but killing "ugly black babies" is OK

FORT WORTH -- Tree branches and bushes are stripped almost bare of their summer foliage, and big piles of bird droppings have turned parts of yards a dirty white, residents say.

The usually green lawns on Tanglewood Trail have turned brown and are dying because of the waste, and homeowners are using professional cleaners to power-wash the bird scat from their driveways and sidewalks.

Not helping the situation is the street sweeper being used by workers putting in a new water line -- when the machine passes by the homes it churns up a billowing, stinky cloud that makes it difficult to breathe.

So what kind of fowl is creating this foul situation and why can't property owners -- or the city of Fort Worth -- do something about it?

Egrets are to blame for the mess, and since they are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act -- which means they cannot be disturbed or removed while nesting -- they are a big reason people in three houses on the street aren't spending time outdoors.

http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/08/05/4156530/neighborhood-overrun-by-protected.html#my-headlines-default

However, as we see in the video below, human beings (in this case blacks) are not afforded the same protections and the "doctor" in this video sees the murder of innocent life in the womb as a service to tax payers - the same tax payers forced to live in the stench left behind by animals.

In this video we see a pro-life Christian group confronting an abortion doctor. The doctor says his abortions save taxpayers money, prevent shootings like the one in Colorado, and rid the world of “ugly black babies.”

Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/2012/08/05/4156530/neighborhood-overrun-by-protected.html#my-headlines-default#storylink=cp

y

              

Pro-life Message Working! Fewer Americans Approve of Killing Babies!

 The 41% of Americans who now identify themselves as "pro-choice" is down from 47% last July and is one percentage point below the previous record low in Gallup trends, recorded in May 2009. Fifty percent now call themselves "pro-life," one point shy of the record high, also from May 2009.

Read more here... http://www.gallup.com/poll/154838/Pro-Choice-Americans-Record-Low.aspx

FLASHBACK! Barack Obama Supports Infanticide

Yahoo voices - FLASHBACK!... On March 30, 2001, Barack Obama stood on the Illinois Senate floor as the only opponent to the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. Essentially the bill stated that if a child were born alive due to a botched abortion, a doctor would be called in to care for the child. It was a straightforward bill, allowing doctors the opportunity to take a viable baby into care and give the child the opportunity at life.

However, Barack Obama, then an Illinois state senator, claimed the bill would be unconstitutional. "I mean, it - it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional." Put simply, since the viable baby was born alive due to a botched abortion, then the child would still be referred to as a "fetus." And under abortion statutes, fetuses do not have the right to life.

So what becomes of these children born due to botched abortions? According to nurse Jill Stanek of Chicago's Christ Hospital, she discovered the "fetuses" in a Soiled Linens Utility Room, left to die. Unable to stomach the thought of these babies dying in misery in something little more than a garbage dump, Stanek lobbied hard to the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. She appeared before the Illinois Senate Judiciary committee and told them of her experiences with the viable babies.

In response to Ms. Stanek's testimony, Christ Hospital opened a Comfort Room. Nurses, should they wish, could bring the born alive fetuses to the comfort room and rock them and care for them until they died. Stanek claims that even though the hospital made abortions "prettier" it did nothing to disguise the fact that the end result would still be dead babies that could have been saved.

In 2002, Barack Obama sent this response to Stanek regarding her lobby for the Born Alive Infant Protection Act as it came up for a vote again. "Ms. Stanek, your initial testimony last year showed your dismay at the lack of regard for human life. I agreed with you last year, and we suggested that there be a Comfort Room or something of that nature be done. The hospital acknowledged that and changes were made and you are still unimpressed. It sounds to me like you are really not interested in how these fetuses are treated, but rather not providing absolutely any medical care or life to them."

Talk about history being rewritten. Obama had nothing to do with the Comfort Rooms. That was the hospital's response to Stanek's testimony. He also did not agree with anything she said, and particularly because he said, "What we are doing here is to create one more burden on women, and I can't support that."

In 2005, after Obama was out of the state senate, the bill passed easily.

The Double Talk of Barack Obama
There are a number of things Obama has backtracked on in his views on abortion. But one thing is clear: he has never admitted he made a mistake. This is a red flag to many pro-life advocates. Even if Obama softens his approach to abortion, he is still a very strong pro-abortionist.

As previously mentioned, Obama backtracked on his views of the "comfort room." In fact, he had nothing to do with the establishment of comfort rooms. This was introduced by Christ Hospital in response to Jill Stanek and the bad press surrounding the live birth abortions.

In 2001, after all the heat and firm opposition to the bill, Obama simply voted "present" instead of "no" to the bill. Hillary Clinton used this vote as one of many "indecisive" votes he had cast in an effort to paint him as an ineffectual leader. One has to wonder if she has a point.

The Born Alive Infant Protection Act came before the Obama-chaired committee in 2003 and was not even allowed to the floor for a vote.

Obama has claimed that had he been presented with the federal version of the 2002 bill, he would have voted for it. But this is most likely a diversion tactic. The 2002 federal version of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act was startling similar to the 2003 version presented to his committee and summarily rejected.

Obama's camp is also trying to claim that he would have voted for the measure had the bill been considered separately and not "bundled" with other bills. This is blatantly untrue. Each time the Born Alive Infant Protection Act came up it was considered individually and was even assigned a separate bill number.

Another smoke-and-mirrors tactic is Obama's attempt to turn the ugly truth of infanticide into the more palatable abortion. By claiming that live birth abortions are an extension of the woman's right to choose, he sees no problems with viable infants being left to die in dark rooms. This is simple infanticide. If a baby is born viable, according to the definition of fetus, then that child cannot be considered a "fetus." Merriam Webster defines a fetus as "an unborn ... a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth." Birth is described as the end of fetal status.

Obama has also tried to put this back on the doctors claiming that it would be "burdensome" for doctors to have to attempt life-saving measures for the infants. He also ventures to claim that the purpose of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act would ultimately undermine the abortion rights as doctors may feel the need to resuscitate non-viable (dead) fetuses.

Lastly, Obama has tried to turn this into a religious debate. By claiming that he cannot make this about "religious" motives, he supports his views of infanticide. He claims that he cannot point to his "religious views" in order to undermine the law. Jill Stanek recalls that in all her lobbying and testimony she never once brought up faith or religion. Alan Keyes, when running against Obama for senate, did say that Jesus would not vote for Barack Obama because, "We are talking about a situation in which, in the course of an abortion procedure, a child has been born alive - is out of the womb, breathing and living on its own - and he cast a vote against the idea that we should not stand by and let that child die!" However, when no other lawmakers stood by Obama in opposition to the bill, it was very clearly not a matter of religion versus law but of humanity.

What this Means for Barack Obama's Campaign
Unfortunately, this issue is being swept under the proverbial rug. Attempts to "soften" Obama's radical image are underway and successful. Voters, both Democrat and Republican, conservative or not, need to be fully aware of the man they vote for. The slope from infanticide is a slippery one. One cannot help but draw comparisons to Hitler's Germany. Once it was "okay" to deny the weak, the mentally ill, the unwanted to die without medical help then it was "okay" to go ahead and just "euthanize" them.

If our society, or specifically our chosen leader, is unwilling to protect the weakest of our people,what audacity of hope do we really have for the future?

Sources:
http://lifenews.com/nat4111.html
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=11799
http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2008/01/top-10-reasons.html
http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007034.cfm
FoxNews, 8/21/2008

Ron Paul SHREDS Declaration of Independence on ABORTION!

The Declaration of Independence makes a very bold claim. It says, among many other things:

`We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.`

Among these are "life". The declaration of independence is a federal document. It speaks of "all men". Not men in one state and not men in another. All men. And it specifically says "life" is a right. A right given by our creator. Life.

Yet Ron Paul doesn`t agree with this. He believes that some states should be allowed to take life by way of abortions. He thinks this should be a state issue and not a federal one. Watch in this video how Rick Santorum gives Ron Paul a lesson in American heritage.

Notice that Paul never refuted Santorum`s stats on his dismal voting record regarding abortion. Also notice that Paul never defended ignoring the Declaration`s bold statement that life is a right. This is clearly a federal issue. Paul`s position would allow abortion (murder) at the state level without federal protection. So if a state wanted to bring back lynching of blacks (or any other group) Paul would simply turn a blind eye saying "well, it`s a state issue". This is the ultimate result in Ron Paulŝ America!

The Bill of Rights is also not a friend of Ron Paul in this debate. The Bill of Rights guarantees freedom from cruel and unusual punishments and excessive bail. Since an unborn child is life, and pictures have shown there is no greater cruelty than what happens in the womb during an abortion, Ron Paul is on the wrong side of this from many angles.

Paul has also ignored federal election laws by taking money from a Russian entity, Russian government funded RT - a Moscow based television enterprise. The sum was 1 million dollars according to WND. It is also interesting to note that Ron Paul has seemingly been promoting Russian foreign policy on Iran and Israel. Russia denies any nefarious intent on the part of the Iranians which is convenient for them since they have benefited from the sale and assistance to Iran in acquiring nuclear material and intelligence.

Ron Paul is shady. Even his biggest supporter, Alex Jones, is a solid ally of RT and a consistent guest on the Russian television shows. The ties to Russian interests are too close for these two. Is it a mere coincidence that evidence shows Paul took money from the Russian government only to then back Russian foreign policy! Hardly. He should be asked to explain this. At the very least the fact that his foreign policy is in lock step with the Russians and his number one supporter openly attacks America on Russian television should be a red flag for even the most die-hard Paul supporter.

FLASHBACK: "All the blame is on Israel" - Ron Paul
This interview with Iran's state-run PressTV ran on January 5, 2009. Ron Paul says that the U.S. should stop supporting Israel, defends Hamas, excuses suicide bombing, and calls Gaza a concentration camp: "To me, I look at it like it's a concentration camp, and people are making bombs, like, they're the aggressors?"

CBC Celebrates 75 Years of Child Abuse and Insanity

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) is “celebrating” seventy five years of existence this year; this week in particular. But what exactly is it they are celebrating? Perhaps it is the fact that they have managed to stay in business using tax-payer money or perhaps that no one has bothered to look into the value of keeping them around at all.

The CBC is an entirely liberal institution funded entirely (the radio division at least) with tax money confiscated from the Canadian people who, for the most part, wholly disagree with the dogma which is promoted by the CBC. The message being vomited out by CBC is a celebration of insanity – messages like homosexuality is normal and equal to heterosexuality. In spite of the overwhelming statistics which show that the “gay” lifestyle is anything but. The Center for Disease Control shows numbers indicating MSM (men who have sex with men) are responsible for nearly 2/3 of all new HIV infections and are the only societal group in which numbers of HIV cases have been rising steadily – a fact completely ignored by CBC. Another fact they ignore is that the vast majority of Canadians are against that sort of life but are fearful of the concocted narrative: that those opposed to it are “homophobes”.

The CBC’s message is that of insanity and stupidity. Liberalism is a mental disorder. The dictionary defines it as such and experts agree – liberalism is a mental disorder. The hundreds of millions of dollars spent propping up a union shop full of idiots and degenerates who run the CBC and who host its programs could be better spent on sorely needed medical staff and equipment which actually save lives instead of destroying them and promoting their destruction i.e. CBC liberal indoctrination.

Another equally heinous message promoted by the CBC abomination is the whole “evolution” narrative happily rammed down the throats of Canada’s youth by child abusers like David Suzuki. The theory of evolution has been entirely debunked by real scientists and yet CBC is allowed to keep perpetuating the myth that people are only animals or, in the words of David Suzuki, “maggots”.

Shows like “Quirks and Quarks” teach the presupposition axiom of evolution in nearly every sentence of every show. It is the basis for all of their dogma – that people are animals and all knowledge must have that “fact” as the underlying theme.

David Suzuki, in a commencement speech to Sarnia Lambton College graduates, told them they are only animals. He went on to say that when he was growing up in British Columbia he was a “horny” fourteen year old and used to go into the woods to masturbate. That was how he fell in love with nature he said. His charge to these children was to protect their local swamps so that future generations of “horny” fourteen year olds could have someplace to go to masturbate and there fall in love with nature themselves. This is child abuse.

So what is the CBC really celebrating? How about 75 years of protecting child abusers and starving the Canadian people of money which could have done some actual good? How about promoting lifestyles which are killing people rather than telling the truth which would set them free? How about enslaving an entire country to the fear of running a foul with the thought police? And how about this? How about we stop funding the CBC abomination and force them to go it on their own? How about they try to get enough advertising (a reflection of how much people really care) to cover their inflated salaries? How about the Canadian population be allowed to know the truth about the CBC monster once and for all?

Go ahead and celebrate, CBC. Celebrate your insanity. The rest of us will be around to at least try to hold you accountable. You do NOT reflect the beliefs of the majority of Canadians. From “The Current” to “Q” you’re all complicit in the moral decay of Canadian culture. And as Alexander Solzhenitsyn said in his famous oration “All of this has befallen us because men have forgotten God”.

2,000 protestors tell MPPs to end taxpayer funding of abortion‏ in Ontario

2,000 protestors tell MPPs to end taxpayer funding of abortion

TORONTO, Oct. 23, 2011 – Holding placards with slogans such as “Kill babies with tax dollars?” and “Not from my wallet!”, around 2,000 demonstrators gathered at Queen’s Park on Saturday Oct. 22, calling on Ontario legislators to end the practice of subsidizing elective abortions. The first ever Defund Abortion Rally was organized by the Youth division of Campaign Life Coalition.

The Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) pays for 30,000 to 51,000 abortions each year, costing the health care system about $1000 for each elective procedure. 23-year old rally organizer, Alissa Golob, opened the rally by belting out a question: “Did you know that $30 - $50 million dollars per year would allow our health care system to hire an additional 200 doctors, or 400 nurses or purchase 20 MRI machines or provide urgent therapy to an additional 500 autistic children each year?”

“I’m here to represent the next generation of taxpayers... I don’t want my taxes to go towards funding the killing of innocent unborn children” said Lia Mills, guest speaker and Toronto area high school student, expressing the frustration felt by all the young people present. “Mr. McGuinty, Members of the Legislature – defund abortion now!” added Mills to enthusiastic applause.

Other guest speakers included university students and Dr. Sze Wan Sit, a staff family physician at St. Michael’s Hospital in downtown Toronto. “If abortion is done electively, it makes sense that the patient will have to pay for it, especially when there are so many other medically necessary procedures that are not funded by OHIP” said Dr. Sit, reinforcing the message.

At the rally, Campaign Life Coalition Youth kicked off a province-wide petition campaign to end taxpayer funding of abortion. The petition will be presented to MPPs in November.


About Campaign Life Coalition Youth

Campaign Life Coalition Youth is a division of Campaign Life Coalition, the national, non-profit organization involved in political action and advocacy for legal and cultural change in Canada with respect to protecting human life and the family. CLC Youth’s mission is to educate youth and to create opportunities for young people to engage in this modern-day civil rights movement.

Visit Campaign Life Coalition for more details.

Herman Cain supports UNREGULATED abortion in US!

REAL CLEAR POLITICS

Herman Cain expresses his personal views on abortion, but says his opinion is not a "directive on the nation." - "The government shouldn't be telling people what to do, especially when it comes to social decisions that they need to make," Cain said."I respect their right to make that choice. I don't have to agree with it."

So essentially Herman Cain, a so-called "conservative" has decided that people should be permitted, without government intervention, to murder their babies. This is absolute insanity. To suggest that government has no say in the preservation of life at all suggests that women have complete say-so on when their unborn baby gets killed and how often that should happen. When did the "right to life" section of the American dream get erased from the American conscience? When did unregulated abortion become a conservative platform? When will Herman Cain be denounced as a conservative?

See original article with video here.

Canada has unregulated abortion. In that country they abort 30% of their conceived population every year as a result. Additionally Canada discovers 500 new cases of breast cancer every week. The link between breast cancer and abortion is known.

Obama's Sebelius Declares "WAR" on Children

President Obama’s Secretary of Health and Human Services said Wednesday that Republicans not only want to curb abortion rights, but also to set women’s health back 50 years [here].

“We are in a war,” said Kathleen Sebelius, in remarks delivered at a Chicago lunch hosted by NARAL Pro-Choice America. She accused the GOP of threatening to take away Medicare benefits, slash Medicaid and government-funded services offered by abortion provider Planned Parenthood.

“They don’t just want to go after the last 18 months,” Sebelius told the gathering of some 300 abortion rights activists. They want to reverse a half-century of “progress women have made in comprehensive health care in America.”

See full story here.

She sure does sound like a warrior for a righteous cause doesn't she? And we'd be justified in thinking that were it not for all those pesky facts getting in the way. Abortion is not progressive as she would have you think. Canada has had unrestricted abortion for the last 25 years. There are currently, since 1988, no laws governing abortion in Canada. For every 100 children conceived in Canada 30 are killed by abortion.

Contemporaneously breast cancer rates have sky-rocketed in Canada. Every week 500 women in Canada are diagnosed with breast cancer. The link between abortion and breast cancer is accepted by most major medical associations. See here for related statistics on this link.

So is this really the kind of "progress" Sebelius wants for the women of America? A country which allows and promotes the killing of innocent children for profit? Planned Parenthood is a for-profit group which kills unborn children for money. Is this really the kind of activity which Obama's girl wants to protect - to wage "war" to promote? This is a war on children and, if taken to its logical conclusion, a war on women as a whole. Fifty percent of these babies are female are they not? And are not 100% of the women having abortions women? Of course they are!

These women will suffer the future consequences of their decisions. This is not the kind of progress worth protecting; not the kind of "war" worth waging. This is an atrocty. This is the Obama administration.

Abortion Ruling: Life Legally Starts at Conception, Rules Mexico Supreme Court

Anti-abortion campaigners have praised a decision by the Mexican Supreme Court that has upheld an amendment to Baja California's state constitution, which reaffirms that in the country life legally commences at conception.

A majority of justices in fact voted to overturn the ruling, however, for the decision to be judged unconstitutional eight of 11 votes were needed; only seven voted to overturn the amendment.

The right-to-life amendment severely restricts abortions in the country. However, Mexico City will still allow abortions for women in the first 12 weeks of their pregnancy.

Pro-abortion campaigners have condemned the ruling saying that it will drive desperate women to seek abortions by illegal means.

However, Jorge Serrano, leader of an anti-abortion organization Pro-Life said, “We have to continue working so that life may triumph,” according to Reuters.

The Mexican justices explained that they were handing down their decision based “strictly on constitutional issues.”

Ray Comfort's "180 Movie" - a horrific exhibition of human depravity

54 countries allow abortion, which is about 61 percent of the world population. Canada has exactly no laws governing or restricting the killing of unborn children... none. A mother's womb should be the safest place on earth for a child and yet women are killing their babies by the millions.

Adolf Hitler killed deformed, mentally ill and disturbed people by virtue of their imperfectness. Western societies are no better than he when determining that a child found to have the exact same defects in the womb are given the same treatment afforded to those with similar afflictions under Hitler's reign of terror.

Additionally, as a matter of convenience, millions of babies are murdered in the mother's womb every year because the mother decides that her immediate situation has no room in it for another human being - entirely similar to the decision made by the Nazi's regarding the "inferior" persons known as the Jews.

Should the world stand up for the millions of people slaughtered in the mother's womb every year? - slaughtered because, like the Jews in the eyes of Hitler, the child is simply not wanted? If not then there was no moral reason the stop Hitler from bulldozing millions of people into the ground alive. There is currently no moral reason to stop any slaughter going on anywhere in the world if there is no moral reason to stop the slaughter of innocent people inside what is supposed to be the safest place on earth. Watch this powerful expose' - it will change your life.

SLAUGHTER IN CANADA - Abortion unregulated up to delivery

Breast cancer continues to be the most common cancer among women in Canada. In 2010 an estimated 23,200 women in Canada were diagnosed with breast cancer. That is an increase of 500 from 2009.

On average 445 Canadian women will be diagnosed with breast cancer every week. Every week. One in nine Canadian women is expected to develop breast cancer during her lifetime. All of these statistics are available at the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation here.

Here are some more statistics:

"The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons believes that patients have the right to give or withhold fully informed consent before undergoing medical treatment. This includes notification of potential adverse effects. While there is a difference of medical opinion concerning the abortion breast cancer link, there is a considerable volume of evidence supporting this link, which is, moreover, highly plausible. We believe that a reasonable person would want to be informed of the existence of this evidence before making her decision." - Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.

A list of medical organizations recognizing a link between abortion and breast cancer is provided here.

So why is this so important as it relates to Canada? Early in Canadian history all abortions were illegal. Under ultra-liberal Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau abortion was decriminalized in 1968 as long as a committee of doctors signed off. In 1988 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that existing laws were unconstitutional. And since then Canada has had no laws governing the subject. None.

Canada currently has no laws governing abortion. A woman in Canada can legally kill her unborn child at any time during the pregnancy as often as she wants - even on the delivery table. She can simply change her mind.

Proverbs 6:16 These six things doth the LORD hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
17 A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood,
18 An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief,
19 A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.