Boy Scouts under attack from radical liberals/homosexuals

Eagle Scout Zach Wahls challenged the Boy Scouts of America's anti-gay policy today when he delivered three boxes of petitions demanding change, signed by more than 275,000 people.

Wahls, 20, presented the petitions during the Boy Scouts' National Annual Meeting in Kissimmee, Fla., on behalf of Jennifer Tyrrell, an Ohio mom who was removed as the den leader of her 7-year-old son's Cub Scout troop in April because of her sexual orientation. The Boy Scouts are the parent organization of the Cub Scouts.

Wahls is the author of "My Two Moms" and a video of his three-minute speech before Iowa legislators urging them not to pass a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage and civil unions went viral in February 2011.

read more http://abcnews.go.com/US/eagle-scout-challenges-boy-scouts-anti-gay-policy/story?id=16459135#.T9cZ27X2aAR

State of the Union - Prop 8 gay marriage ban remains overturned

A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that it will not review a three-judge panel's decision to overturn California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage.

Following this ruling by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, Proposition 8 proponents areexpected to appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, putting the battle for same-sex marriage on a national stage. The Supreme Court could decide to hear the case as part of its docket next year.

read more http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/court-rejects-appeal-overturn-prop-8-ruling-case-171244320.html

Homosexuals launch battle against evangelical university

(NBC NEWS) LA MIRADA, Calif. – On the same day President Obama became the first U.S. president to come out in support of same-sex marriage, a group of students announced the presence of the “Biola Queer Underground” at this small evangelical university, touching off a highly-charged debate about Christianity and homosexuality.

The group launched a website and posted flyers around the Biola University campus May 9 with the following message: “We want to bring to light the presence of the LGBTQ community at Biola. Despite what some may assume, there are Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, Transgender, and Queers at Biola. We are Biola’s students, alumni, employees, and fellow followers of Christ. We want to be treated with equality and respected as another facet of Biola’s diversity.”

The emergence of the group, whose members remain anonymous, has shaken this 104-year-old Christian college in Southern California. Like many schools rooted in evangelical Christianity, Biola has a code of standards that includes prohibitions on sex outside of marriage and same-sex relationships: Sex is “designed by God to be expressed solely within a marriage between a husband and wife,” according to Biola’s student handbook, which goes on to say that “sexual misconduct, depending on the facts and circumstances of each case will result in disciplinary action.”

Read the full story ›

• 
  

Marvel Comics Joins DC Comics in Letting the Gay Times Roll

Marvel Comics announces ‘X-Men's’ Northstar to have same-sex wedding; DC Comics to out super hero as gay 

In wake of President Obama's change on issue, comic book companies are diversifying

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/marvel-comics-announces-x-man-northstar-same-sex-wedding-dc-comics-super-hero-gay-article-1.1082606#ixzz1vhCNojyz

Obama Pulls a Ron Paul - Defers to States on "Gay" Marriage Laws

In a recent email from the Official Obama Campaign headquarters President used his new stance on "gay" marriage as a campaign tool to drum up support from the his liberal base. (see here).

However Obama cleverly deferred to the states on the legal aspect of it, effectively borrowing from Ron Paul who said he would defer to states on issues like abortion. Here's the quote from the email:

I respect the beliefs of others, and the right of religious institutions to act in accordance with their own doctrines. But I believe that in the eyes of the law, all Americans should be treated equally. And where states enact same-sex marriage, no federal act should invalidate them.

WOW! - now THAT'S politics for you! Taking a stand but not really taking a stand. Good job Barack. He's come across as both in favor of states rights AND "gay" marriage. 

However - and it's a big however - what will happen should Obama get re-elected is anyone's guess. Lame-duck presidents are very dangerous; especially ones with a radical agenda. Can someone who's views on something so socially divisible and traditionally meaningful have changed so dramatically over such a short period of time be trusted to keep his word on anything at all?

Unlike Ron Paul, who's views have remained consistent since forever, Barack Obama has an "evolving" moral compass. A man who never had a reliable father-figure for any sustained length of time - handed off from one man to another - who's choices of friends have turned out to be the poorest one could possibly imagine - cavorting with terrorists and the like - and now coming around 180 degrees on one of the most dangerous lifestyles on earth - homosexuality.

Clearly the president is on the wrong side of this issue. Many of us saw it coming however, you know, slippery slopes and whatnot.  

THE POPE WAS RIGHT - Sanctioning "gay" marriage ruining the future of humanity

(photo - librarising.com)

World Net Daily reported this week Pope Benedict XVI denounced gay marriage in his annual “State of the World” address Monday, going so far as to say the same-sex nuptials threaten the future of humanity.

Reporting on a New York Daily News article WND quoted them saying - in the speech, the pope, 84, unleashed what some consider being his strongest tirade against gay marriage, saying it is among conventions that “undermine the family” and “threaten human dignity and the future of humanity itself,” - a report which originated with REUTERS.

Rather than viewing the activity as degenerate, when society sanctions it there opens up the accepted void wherein those disgruntled with heterosexuality, even from a young age, more easily embrace the activity as normal rather than seeking help for something once seen in its true, heinous light. Generally speaking those with daddy issues lean toward the "gay" lifestyle (though not all) and now that we have a society with increasing numbers of absentee fathers we will see more and more homosexual tendencies and the acceptance of such will lead to an exponential crisis for humanity.

One wonders if the Pope was channeling the U.S. Center for Disease Control which has an article which details the savage effects men who have sex with men have had on the male population and the human population at large. From the CDC:

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM)1 represent approximately 2% of the US population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV and are the only risk group in which new HIV infections have been increasing steadily since the early 1990s. In 2006, MSM accounted for more than half (53%) of all new HIV infections in the United States, and MSM with a history of injection drug use (MSM-IDU) accounted for an additional 4% of new infections. At the end of 2006, more than half (53%) of all people living with HIV in the United States were MSM or MSM-IDU. Since the beginning of the US epidemic, MSM have consistently represented the largest percentage of persons diagnosed with AIDS and persons with an AIDS diagnosis who have died.

It is exactly because of this unreported truth (at least in the main stream) that men who have ever had sex with men are never permitted to give blood; yet another reason that particular lifestyle is damaging the future of humanity. Think of the life-giving blood supply which is robbed of crucial stock simply because a politically correct society has taken leave of its senses and embraced the activity which leads to such destructive results.

So cudos to the Vatican for daring to speak the truth about this plague on the human experience. Now if only this type of boldness were as contageous as the diseases caused by the activity which the Pope has denounced in his speech... if only.

Matt Damon SLAMS Gay Marriage - "some things only a mother can give a child"

Whether he meant to do it or not, Matt Damon gave the "gay" marriage and adoption movement a smack down this week in an interview with closet homosexual Anderson Cooper on Damon's new movie "We Bought a Zoo".

In the interview Damon is relating to the character in the movie saying, "I think mostly because I saw it as a love story between this guy and his wife". Then, in a surreal moment of clarity; especially for the Hollywood elite, Damon tells Cooper there are things that only a mother can give to her child. "I just see in my wife... the way she can talk to our kids and I am just thankful that she is there." 


The full interview will air Wednesday Dec 21. You can see the preview written by Cooper himself here. Even though he doesn't discuss his personal life, independent news media have reported that Cooper is "gay" and in May 2007, Out magazine ranked him second behind David Geffen in its list of the fifty "Most Powerful Gay Men and Women in America."

LIBERALISM - Why There's no REAL Love in the World

Liberalism is defined in the dictionary as an "unrestricted" lifestyle. Specifically it says -

"unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor"

As we will explain - there is absolutely no room for real love in this definition and so there is no room for real love in liberalism. Liberalism has destroyed the real love which used to exist in western society and now the price is being paid for it - and a heavy one at that.

Imagine looking out your window and seeing your 5 year old son wander off into the street. "He must have gotten out somehow" you think. So you begin walking calmly but briskly to the door and head outside to retrieve him. As you cross the front yard you notice a car coming down the road. Your gate picks up. You begin to do a few calculations in your mind. Can you make it in time? You look at your son who seems completely unaware. You yell out his name as you run toward him. He looks at you - confused. "Why is mommy so scared"? he wonders. He looks down the road and also sees the car... and it's very close.

There are three possible outcomes to this story. Liberalism dictates that the little boy should be permitted, without restriction, to remain in the road. What right does his mother have to "restrict" him? When she does she is imposing her own views on the matter. She is imposing conservative values on him - she is conserving his life. Yet the liberal mindset dictates that she does not have the right to do that. But the mother is imposing love on her son. She is loving him by restricting him - if that is the outcome.

"DO NO HARM". This is the oath taken by doctors who vow to never hurt - only help. Yet there is a more prevalent oath which comes ahead of "do no harm". It is Primum Succerrere. Those are the Latin words for "Hasten to Help". It is applied when a doctor breaks a bone in order to have it heal and be better. It is what the mother would apply to her son when yanking him out of harm's way while hurting him physically by pulling his arm or perhaps hurting his feelings or damaging him emotionally although saving his life. Liberalism has removed this love - this greatest of acts of salvation in favor of ignoring the consequences and watching people die.

Liberalism dictates that the mother would not even have left the house but rather watch in horror as the car plows into the boy. It was his decision to do it - his will to explore the road. She had no right to impose her values on the situation. But real love WOULD impose it's judgments on the boy - and throw itself into the situation like dog on a bone. There would be no hesitation - no pondering the "feelings" of the moment. Love just DOES it! It rushes in because it knows the alternative - it knows the results of inaction.

Liberalism is a permissive attitude toward everything and everybody. As soon as any type of restriction is placed there exists an attempt to conserve something - or somebody. If a person, for example, wishes to preserve their marriage they could not possibly hope to do so while living an unrestricted liberal sexual lifestyle. Likewise for driving privileges - you cannot drive in an unrestricted liberal manner and expect to keep your licence. In order to conserve your legal ability to drive a vehicle you must use conservative principles - like Margaret Thatcher once said: "The facts of life are conservative".

So lets extrapolate this concept to greater issues like homosexuality, promiscuity, drug use, etc. When people say it's wrong or a "sin" for a man to have sex with a man it is an act of love. Even when it hurts the person's feelings or messes with their emotions it is still love. We step in and say "wait a minute - not only does the Bible say this is wrong but science and the medical community agree - this will hurt you". Liberalism calls on us to shut up and go away; to allow the person to be hit by the car while we look on in horror - to NOT yell "fire" in a room that is engulfed in flames.

Now let's take this even further. The "Great Commission" is this -

Matthew 28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.

The ultimate love is knowing that there is a hell to shun and a heaven to embrace and then telling everyone you meet about it. Sure - there is a certain level of ego behind it. I mean, seriously, you want others to believe that your idea on eternity is right while all others are wrong. Yet you know it to be true and you know that everyone else has a ticket on the Titanic. You're offering them a way of escape. You are offering them salvation with eternal benefit and redemption from eternal suffering. This is the ultimate act of "Hasten to Help". And we continue to do it anyway, in spite of the ridicule and mocking, because the little pain today is worth the riches of salvation both for today and eternity.

Does George Michael have AIDS? (video)

Stories are circulating in a mad frenzy that George Michael has been hospitalized with pneumonia once again. A video has surfaced suggesting he may have aids.

The CDC reports the following on their MSM page. Remember that George Michael is a practicing homosexual.

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM)1 represent approximately 2% of the US population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV and are the only risk group in which new HIV infections have been increasing steadily since the early 1990s

.

Here is the youtube video making this claim.

BREAKING: Yasser Arafat Died of AIDS! - CLOSET HOMOSEXUAL

ISRAEL TODAY

New autopsy details soon to be released by the French hospital where Yasser Arafat died in 2004 once again suggest that the former PLO leader and icon of the "Palestinian cause" was suffering from AIDS.

Arafat's family has agreed to make public the autopsy report, which describes a "platelet disorder," Arafat's nephew, Nasser al-Qidwa, told Bethlehem's Ma'an news agency at the weekend.

The doctors reportedly go on to speculate on the reason for the platelet disorder, ruling out cancer and acute infection.

Al-Qidwa, speaking at his uncle's graveside in Ramallah on Friday to mark the seventh anniversary of his passing, continued to insist that Arafat was poisoned by Israel.

But the autopsy report also points out that doctors were not able to find any trace of poison in Arafat's body, a fact that al-Qidwa begrudgingly acknowledged:

"We reaffirm our conviction that Israel was responsible for the poisoning of the late president Yasser Arafat, but we recognize our inability to get a definitive answer."

For those not sidetracked by political correctness, and who are willing to employ a little deductive reasoning, there is another alternative: AIDS.

The HIV virus that results in AIDS is well known to cause platelet disorders.

The Palestinians have vehemently rejected the AIDS option, as the condition is typically associated with a homosexual lifestyle.

But according to former eastern European intelligence officials, Arafat was, in fact, a closet homosexual.

In his book Red Horizons, former Romanian intelligence chief Lt.-Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa recounted how during visits to the regime of former Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu to obtain training and funds for his PLO forces, Arafat would engage in homosexual affairs with his bodyguards.

In one instance, Pacepa writes about checking in with Gen. Constantin Munteaunu, who was assigned to Arafat. Munteaunu reportedly responded:

"I just called the microphone monitoring center to ask about the 'Fedayee' [Arafat's code name]. After the meeting with the Comrade, he went directly to the guest house and had dinner. At this very moment, the 'Fedayee' is in his bedroom making love to his bodyguard. The one I knew was his latest lover. He's playing tiger again. The officer monitoring his microphones connected me live with the bedroom, and the squawling almost broke my eardrums. Arafat was roaring like a tiger, and his lover yelping like a hyena."

Later in the book Pacepa wrote that after learning all he had about the Palestinian leader through years of spying on him, "I felt a compulsion to take a shower whenever I had been kissed by Arafat, or even just shaken his hand."

In 2007, Ahmad Jibril, leader of the Palestinian Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command, told Hizballah's Al-Manar TV that current Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas had admitted to him that Arafat died of AIDS.

"When [Abbas] came to Damascus with his team, I asked them: 'What happened to the investigation into the death of Abu Amar [Arafat's nom de guerre]? The Israelis killed him. He was my colleague ever since 1965 and used to sleep at my home. He and I followed the same path,'" Jibril said. "They were silent, and then one of them said to me: 'To be honest, the French gave us the medical report, that stated that the cause of Abu Ammar's death was AIDS.' I am not saying this, they did."

BREAKING - Toronto Zoo says being "gay" is not "NORMAL"

ABC News reported November 8th that the Toronto zoo will separate a pair of "gay" penguins.

“The males will be put in with a specific female so they have the chance to get to know one another, and if they bond, that’s what we’re looking for,” Bill Rapley, the zoo’s executive director of conservation and wildlife, told ABCNews.com.

The hypocrisy here is more than astounding. They are forcing these male "gay" penguins to separate so that they can interact with females! The overwhelming atrocity here comes further on in the story when the relationship between these two penguins is described as not "normal". In fact - a spokesman from the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology in Ithaca, N.Y. went so far as to say the activity is "odd".

“When you put things in captivity, odd things happen,” Kevin McGowan of the Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology in Ithaca, N.Y., told ABCNews.com. “The way penguins work is they do get paired for a long time. Basically, the only other penguin they care about is their mate, so it’s important for them to find somebody who’s compatible, and if you don’t have a normal upbringing then it’s difficult to say how ‘normal’ they can be.”

What? Excuse me but is this the Iranian zoo we're talking about here? Clearly the ABC News reporter was mistaken when he wrote "Toronto Zoo". Toronto is the center of liberal thought east of the Mississippi. How could the "Toronto" zoo possibly be thinking about separating two "gay" animals? After all - aren't WE animals? Is the implication here that ALL animals are not "normal" who act out in a homosexual manner? It sure does seem to be.

Here's another VERY enlightening aspect to this story.

"...if you don’t have a normal upbringing then it’s difficult to say how ‘normal’ they can be.”

Clearly the zoo officials are implying that living "gay" is abnormal. So the zoo is willing to admit, albeit inadvertently, that for penguins at least it would be more "normal" to live as heterosexual and that "normal upbringing" would result in "normal" heterosexual activity. The alternative is, according to the Toronto zoo, abnormal.

Can we please at least hope these types of slips into sanity-land become more and more "normal" as society, whether aware of it or not, becomes more and more fed up with accepting abnormal and socially destructive activity? Indeed we can.

See story from ABC News here.