Zev Porat

Sunday, September 11, 2011

Atheism's DISTURBING Doctrines and tenets... plus videos!

One of the characteristics of atheism that is immediately noticeable is the overwhelming amount of foul language that is used. Even the most educated among them seem to suffer from the affliction of tourette syndrome. As much as I hate to do it I was forced on a couple of occasions to delete comments due to their graphic content. I have to repeatedly remind these self proclaimed animals that foul language and belittling others in order to prop yourself up are leading indicators of a lesser intelligence. (continues below video)

Now we get into the meat of the issue as far as mental dysfunction is concerned. Atheists repeatedly deny that atheism is a religion. That is a classic delusion. It reminds me of Saddam Hussein's press secretary, affectionately known as "Baghdad Bob" telling reporters in an outdoor press conference that U.S. tanks had not entered the capital while in the background the entire world witnessed United States Army tanks rolling through town right behind him. Well, Baghdad Bob could probably be excused for his deceit considering the circumstances but is there any real excuse for the atheist besides severe mental illness? No. Their attempts to hide behind the cloak of non-religion have failed miserably. One atheist will say "we have no belief in any god so we have no religion" and recently another atheist commented "there is no way that God could possibly exist" which is a classic positive assertion of a negative belief. It confirms the religious nature of atheism because in order to know that there is no way god can exist a person would have to know everything there is to know about everything and have been everywhere in the universe and beyond. That requires a little more faith than I am willing to give it and still not refer to it as a religion. And by the way, Buddhists don't believe in God either and society has no problem calling it a religion. Again classic delusion.

Now, moving right along here there are some disturbing doctrines within the religion of atheism that are cause for concern. It has been brought up repeatedly that since atheism teaches that humans are nothing more than animals, it would be completely acceptable for one human being to eat another if it was a matter of life and death. I believe the theological word for this doctrine is CANNIBALISM! This acceptance of cannibalism as a religious tenet really does confirm the old saying, "If you remove God from academia the best one could ever hope to achieve is to end up with highly educated barbarians". The acceptance of the doctrine of cannibalism into the religion of atheism is the fulfillment of that statement. I want to touch on one last aspect of the religion of atheism in this segment and that is the value of the human experience. At least one atheist with whom I had extensive conversations with, publicly lamented his own personal use of painkillers and antibiotics because he felt he was doing a disservice to the religious doctrine of evolution. By keeping himself alive he felt he was hindering the process of natural selection and he wished he could sacrifice himself to the process rather than artificially maintain his existence. Now if that doesn't call for some sort of inquiry then society is beyond help.

Let me end this segment with a quote from one atheist in particular which was extraordinary even for an atheist:
Even if atheists were "destroying society." what have humans done well in the first place to deserve to dominate the earth. We use up resources faster than any other organism and more than we need. We control populations of other species, and we make them go extinct. We need houses, clothes, things made by OTHER people, just to survive. All other organisms are much more efficient and can survive without any of this s**t. I deserve to die, you deserve to die, all humans deserve to die.- Atheist

Naturalism is a philosophy. It is embraced by every atheist. Here is how dictionary.com defines naturalism in the context of our discussion.
4. Philosophy.
a. the view of the world that takes account only of natural elements and forces, excluding the supernatural or spiritual. b. the belief that all phenomena are covered by laws of science and that all teleological explanations are therefore without value.
There you go. Naturalism. Not only does naturalism deny the existence of God, but it also declares the non-existence of any other realm except the natural. Therefore, by embracing the philosophy of naturalism, atheists have come up with several pseudo-qualifiers which have enabled them to be embraced by society. The sub-doctrine of evolution by natural selectionis perhaps chief among them. The apologists of Atheism use incredibly harsh tactics to put unbelievers in their place. They use their time in indoctrination mills to nurse from the breast of elitism and embrace the illusion of intellectual superiority while ingesting the talking points they will later use on people like me. Here are some examples from atheists who proudly illustrated the doctrine of naturalism.
The difference is that one can feel and MEASURE the wind. That measurement can be repeated and verified objectively. Can your god be felt by everyone with the gift to feel? Can your god be objectively measured? Can we all agree on said measurement? Your analogy is as solid as the design of the hindenburg. Atheist
If one has seen no evidence of God, then faith doesn't even enter into the issue. Faith is only employed to support that which is *not* perceived. Faith is only employed when you willfully reject what your five senses/brain are telling you. There is a MOUNTAIN of physical evidence to support the theory of evolution. Doesn't mean it's perfectly correct. But tell me- where's the evidence for God's existence? Never mind providing a mountain. Just give us a scrap of objective evidence. Atheist
Throughout history, most Gods have eventually faltered and failed. Even the God of Abraham, conveniently placed "outside the universe" eventually must meet the same fate. He is a manifestation, and at times he has been a worthy one. But humanity will certainly leave him behind, as they have left all others. Is this bad? I don't know and not knowing is OK with me. Atheist
Perhaps future generations will find that the tendency to create/worship deities was an important part of the evolution of our species. Wouldn't that be ironic? Atheist

There you go. As you can see, there is really no attempt to hide this doctrine. It is, as I have previously pointed out, a delusion bubble. It's an existential paradigm separate from reality and is trying desperately to displace reality in spite of the inevitable outcome.

As an observer of the human condition I see how people, when confronted with the notion that there is no other reality than the natural, simply shake their heads in unbelief and walk away disturbed that anyone would believe such nonsense. And yet the ranks are swelling among the atheists. Why. How is happening? Are they succeeding at displacing reality? Hardly. These apparent victories are signs of the soon return of Jesus Christ to the earth. It is part of the "strong delusion" and "great falling away" that must happen before His coming. People will mock Christianity and say things like "where is the promise of his coming"? According to Peter we shouldn't be surprised by any of this. The Devil is playing his flute and people are dancing in his shadow like pigs to the slaughter house.


Now I know that many atheists have never heard of these doctrines but that is irrelavent. If you were to ask a room full of Calvinists what the five points of Calvinism are you would receive a room full of blank stares in return for your effort.

The fourth doctrine of Atheism surfaced almost immediately. It is the doctrine of Liberalism. Let's allow dictionary.com to define it for us.

1. the quality or state of being liberal, as in behavior or attitude.
2. a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.

There you go. Liberalism. The key word in that entire definition is the word "unrestricted". Atheists want to live without moral or social boundaries dictated to them by a greater moral authority. In their defeated minds God doesn't exist so his statutes are meaningless. Everything becomes subjected to circumstance. I once listened to well known atheist apologist Dan Barker explain the set of events that would make rape a morally acceptable act. (continues below videos)

The doctrine of liberalism has led to the modern holocaust of abortion, the destruction of the traditional family, the enslavement of the entire western world due to liberal governing practices leading to unfair taxation, and the degradation of the human condition due to the removal of the restrictions that kept us intact. As Margaret Thatcher one said, "The Facts of Life are Conservative". Liberalism removes humanity's preservative and leaves it out on the table to rot. The foul stench of the decay is on full display in the comment sections of my websites which I will not be quoting here. The rotten language spewing forth from these self proclaimed animals is evidence enough to indict them all of destroying whatever dignity the western world once possessed.

There needs to be no other nod to the ones who claim the soon return of Jesus Christ than the wide spread acceptance of the doctrine of liberalism and Atheism has made it a primary element in its constitution.


Over the years atheists have gone to great lengths to hide behind the cloak of non-religion. Whenever someone like me comes on the scene, atheists come out by the hundreds to defend the "non-religion" of Atheism. I refer to those people as apologists. There's no doubt they are highly intelligent and skilled debaters. However, resulting from their attempts has been some overwhelming evidence to support a doctrinal structure that appears to form a constitution. I have been able to isolate five "doctrines" as I call them and this third element is extremely disturbing on a psychological level. It is the doctrine of defeatism. Here's how dictionary.com defines it.

the attitude, policy, or conduct of a person who admits, expects, or no longer resists defeat, as because of a conviction that further struggle or effort is futile; pessimistic resignation.

There you go. Defeatism. As someone who has personally experienced the love of God in both an emotional and tangible sense, it is heart wrenching to read many of the defeatist comments posted on my various internet ministries. For example, one gentleman who will go unnamed expressed a public lament for having to take antibiotics and painkillers because he felt he was slowing the process of evolution. Here are some other examples of the doctrine of defeatism as expressed by actual atheists.
There is NO loving, personal deity that has a specific plan for individuals & such claims are nothing more than a desire & tenacity to carry on living & a reluctance to accept you're not special.Atheist 
I could care less what name i give to ur pethatic therapy group! the fact is, it's all about ME, life has no meaning, so stop pretending u can do better, just shut up and get on with ur day Atheist
Life is merely a meaningless accident, and there is no actual meaning or purpose to any living creatures, as Meaning only applies to conscious entities, when there are no concious beings (human) , there also is no such a thing as meaning; Atheist

Isn't that amazing? These cases are not isolated bursts of insanity like, you know, that crazy uncle that embarrasses you all the time. No. This is a doctrine that is woven through the faith structure of atheism. They've given in to the sensually known environment and given up on the other ninety percent of their brain. They are defeated. They are atheists.


Let's begin with how dictionary.com defines elitism.

1.The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.
Well, there you have it. The doctrine of elitism. Now, I don't make this accusation without proof. I have received thousands of comments from the apologists of the religion of atheism who openly and proudly display the doctrine of elitism for all the world to see. Non-atheists who watch the show from the sidelines are amazed at the flaming arrogance and elitist thought structure that emerges immediately in the comments sections of my articles. Here are just a few examples. We will not reveal the identity of any person leaving the comments.
If i found a moment where the degree of stupidity was limited, I would be obliged to respond.I may however, create a video response for the amusement of myself and everyone else. Atheist 
How the hell do you have the nerve to question evolution when we have biological proof on top of over 300yrs of physical data collated from just about every single branch of science? Atheist 
Did you even attend school???? Atheist 
Rational thought requires evidence, your beliefs do not therefore somewhere along the way (if you ever had it to begin with) you lost the power of rational thought & now clearly no longer even know what it is! Atheist 
I'm surprised you can even spell the word 'intelligence'. Atheist
Ken Ham????? hahahaha are you serious???? Who’s next, Kent Hovind???? haha, oh come on! How about you find me a REAL scientist who's actually submitted work for peer view? Atheist 
No disrespect but i wouldn't read any book written by a creationist as it would no doubt be full of lies. Atheist 
I couldn't possibly deny the irrefutable evidence for evolution like your sort shamefully do. Atheist 
There's no such thing as "creation scientists", these men aren't scientists, they're shady, misleading, religious entrepreneurs Atheist 
Instead of pointlessly TRYING to discredit evolution, how about you give us some evidence to warrant your underdeveloped, primitive beliefs? Now that would be a novel idea hey! Atheist 
Writing moronic books & making retarded video's doesn't count as being "busy". Atheist 
Yes i have a son which is more than you will ever have. Just because your colossal ego can't handle the fact that you are made of animal cells (although i've seriously encountered more intelligent plants) doesn't make change a thing. Atheist 
If you reject Evolution by Natural Selection, then don't go to a modern Western hospital Atheist 
You admit to having no scientific credentials, but you then defer to someone else (Hovind) who also has no scientific credentials (his "degrees" were from unaccredited degree mills). Atheist 
In any case, Hovind has no scientific education either he got his "degrees" from an non-accredited degree mill and "taught" at an non-accredited private school. Atheist 
You can't even sperate from dirt and beeing, you must really be a good scientist why don't you shut up and go back to your little world. Atheist

Isn't that amazing? These comments represent ninety percent of the group-think that prevails in the religion of atheism and is indicative of the mainstream belief structure cemented within the religion. They're smarter than everyone else. Only the indoctrination umm. education they received is worthy of any serious consideration. Only their word definitions are legitimate. And only their liberal lifestyle, no matter how destructive, is worth aspiring to. It is the existential paradigm of atheism and the doctrine of elitism provides the mental and social justification for taking God out of the paradigm and fortifying the delusion bubble that keeps reality from setting in. "We are wonderful. We are animals. It's all about us. We are atheists".


I consider the people who come to my website, blogs, and youtube channel to argue in favor of the religion to be apologists. The brightest bulbs in the room if you will. And most of them really are quite intelligent.

By inviting comments and interacting with them they have done a great job of exposing the overwhelmingly agreed upon faith structure of the religion. We start the series with the most alarmingly obvious doctrine Cannibalism.

Now this doctrine was revealed to me in the process of researching my fourth book, "The Great Debate". I touched on it briefly in the book but I wasn't sure if it was random, isolated cases of disgusting social dysfunction or across the board commonality among all atheists. Over the intervening months I have discovered, or rather it was revealed to me by the atheists, that cannibalism has been accepted into mainstream atheism as a matter of fact. Allow me to read just a couple of the comments left by atheists concerning the act of eating people
As for eating my friend. If he was dead then yes I would. He is an animal, just like I am and just like you are. I would expect him to do the same if placed in that situation. Atheist 
And in my own mind I would like to think I would be able to eat a fellow man who was dead or had no chance to survive to keep myself alive Atheist
Isn't that amazing? I wouldn't dare reveal the identities of these people but those were actual quotes from people on my blog and YouTube channel. Here's how dictionary.com defines cannibalism
cannibalismnoun 1. the eating of human flesh by another human being. 2. the eating of the flesh of an animal by another animal of its own kind. 3. the ceremonial eating of human flesh or parts of the human body for magical or religious purposes, as to acquire the power or skill of a person recently killed. 4. the act of pecking flesh from a live fowl by a member of the same flock. 5. the removal of parts, equipment, assets, or employees from one product, item, or business in order to use them in another. 6. the acquisition and absorption of smaller companies by a large corporation or conglomerate.

There you go. Cannibalism. I bet you can guess where this doctrine comes from. It comes from the teaching that people are nothing more than animals. This is another doctrine of atheism that we will discuss in this series. The creation story of atheism. The doctrine of evolution.

What would I do if I was faced with the choice of starvation or cannibalism? That choice will never be a part of my life. In my existential paradigm, there is always the God option. I would pray. I would expect one of three or more or a combination of things to happen. Either God would rescue me out of the predicament or He would provide me with food to eat or probably a combination of both. A third option would be a supernatural sustaining of the body until help arrives. Let me make one thing perfectly clear. Death for the Christian is a sweet release. It is entry into the heavenly. The Bible says that to die is "gain". For the Christian to resort to desecrating a corpse is to throw ones faith into reverse. For the atheist, however, it is a testimony to the barbaric nature of the religion and the need to expose it before it destroys society beyond repair.


  1. When people learn a bit about logical fallacies, they can see how atheists are mostly bluster. They pretend that they are the brightest bulbs in the cutlery drawer. (In fact, you realize that it is emotional intimidation, and they try to turn it back on YOU if you disagree. Winning through intimidation?) I did a series of "logic lessons" on my Weblogs, but they did not learn. Hopefully, rational people can get something out of them.

    Look up tu quoque, ad hominem, straw man, genetic fallacy, poisoning the well and you have most of their "arguments". Don't fear the atheist, no need to be intimidated or to let them put you on the defensive.

    Oh, and I dared to write an article asking, "Does atheism cause brain damage?" Can't do that. Their double standard is, "Attack and ridicule Christians, Conservatives, the Bible, the Constitution, whatever. But NO WAY is any question about the wisdom of atheists and atheism to be allowed". When they can't dismantle the evidence, they seek to destroy the messenger. Pay no attention, they act like schoolyard bullies.

  2. Cannibalism has gone mainstream? Prove it. I want names, articles, studies and something other than the logical fallacies created by your imagination. I'm not atheist myself, but I know many and never once has even a single one ever mentioned cannibalism in a positive light, much less as something they'd participate in themselves.
    This is something you made up to further demonize a group you disagree with. Prove it or admit it's a complete lie.

    1. @Shannon - proof is a mathematecal term. But the evidence for this comes from the atheists themselves. Each one surveyed said they would eat human flesh if they required it to survive. Like a rapist who has already made up his mind to rape a woman is rightfully labeled a "RAPIST" so too is a person who "would" eat human flesh, even without actually DOING it, properly labeled a CANNIBAL!!!

  3. @Shannon - proof is a mathematecal term. But the evidence for this comes from the atheists themselves. Each one surveyed said they would eat human flesh if they required it to survive. Like a rapist who has already made up his mind to rape a woman is rightfully labeled a "RAPIST" so too is a person who "would" eat human flesh, even without actually DOING it, properly labeled a CANNIBAL!!!

  4. "proof is a mathematecal term"? OK, then criminology is a branch of math, right? After all, we need proof the criminal commited the crime. "Each one surveyed said they would eat human flesh if they required it to survive". Pretty much like everyone else in the whole damn fucking planet. Remember the Andes Miracle? All were Christians. Also, they said "if they required it to survive", so this means that as long as there's something edible other than a fellow human being, they (and any other person, atheist or not) won't do it. Remember: "Thou shall not lie or commit false judgement".

    1. The criminal justice system relies on the best evidence leading beyond reasonable doubt. Proof is a math term. The fact remains that when a person makes up their mind before hand that they WOULD eat someone that person IS a cannibal... regardless of there being another alternative.

      For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he -
      Proverbs 23:7a

  5. The criminal justice system relies on the best evidence leading beyond reasonable doubt. Proof is a math term. The fact remains that when a person makes up their mind before hand that they WOULD eat someone that person IS a cannibal... regardless of there being another alternative.

    For as he thinketh in his heart, so is he -
    Proverbs 23:7a

  6. We debated Mike on this very topic and others via our podcast here: