There is a strong case for the application of the term ``Stockholm Syndrome``on a mass scale to the proceedings streaming out of N. Korea today - mass wailing and moaning from the crowds as though each person had lost their only child.
In psychology, Stockholm Syndrome is an apparently paradoxical psychological phenomenon in which hostages express empathy and have positive feelings towards their captors, sometimes to the point of defending them. These feelings are generally considered irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors for an act of kindness.
Many people observe a video like the one above and say it must be rigged or they must be forced to do it. This is not necessarily the case. The people of N. Korea live in total isolation and this is now the third generation of leaders to subjugate the people in this manner. They literally worship their captors. Much of this worship could be attributed to the Stockholm Syndrome phenomenon. If they observe abuse, especially on others, the perceived lack of abuse against them personally could be interpreted as kindness and this fits according to the Syndrome parameters.
The regime lifts itself up as gods and are worshiped as such. There should be no surprise when we are shown images of people showing intense emotional suffering when the god dies. They have been abused and are suffering from a mental disorder - Stockholm Syndrome.
This relates to modern Atheism in the same way. Around the western world we are seeing young people jettison their faith because someone talked them out of it using intellectual tyranny. In a WND interview Hitchens told Art Moore to ``give it up`` saying "You'll be happier," he insisted." Maybe not at first, but you will be." This is terrible intellectual manipulation. There is no way Hitchens could know he would be happier. In fact Hitchens life was anything but ``happy``.
``If you ask: would I do it again? I would probably say yes. But I would have quit earlier hoping to get away with the whole thing. I decided all of life is a wager and I'm going to wager on this bit`` - HitchensAnd he lost that wager. He lived life as a true Liberal - an unrestricted lifestyle - an ungodly lifestyle - and he lost. Yet he managed to convince many others to join him whilst hurling himself off the cliff. Like he tried to do with WND`s writer, Hitchens attempted to manipulate people out of their faith - a place of peace and hope into a place of chaotic doubt and closed-minded naturalism - cut off from the realities of the transcendental realm. Like the people of N. Korea, Hitchens had caused many to be cut off from the real world and to embrace, often against their will due to the inability or lack of preparedness intellectually, the delusion of atheism. These people, the victims of Hitch`s tyranny, are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome.
"... cut off from the REALITIES of the TRANSCENDENTAL realm." Please, that is statement is dripping with contradicting definitions.
ReplyDeleteI feel like a better parallel can be drawn between Stockholm Syndrome and Christianity. People gather weekly around a speaker to tell them how sinful and worthless they all are just because they're human, and when these people die there is mourning.
By the way, everyone dies. Saying it is ironic that someone developed cancer is nothing short of cruel, and it's terrible to try to use it as vindication for your own faith and the idea that an atheist got what he was gettin'. I guess Haiti was irony, too, right? Those heathens...
Atheism is not intellectual tyranny; atheism is often the end result of people thinking for themselves and not being able to justify a belief. Christianity and exclusive religions, on the other hand, only survive BECAUSE of intellectual tyranny. If your religion says one thing, but you rationalize otherwise, you just have to accept that the "creator" knows best and has "his" reasons, or just shut up because as soon as someone finds out you feel otherwise you'll be ridiculed; if there's anything about Western culture and religion that's true, it's that people are always in a pissing contest about how "devout" they are, and how quick they are to call someone "not a TRUE believer" because of a difference in ideology. These religions thrive on subjugation, because it's in the idea that we are nothing without "him" that serves as it's foundation.